Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;30(9):1865-1871.
doi: 10.3201/eid3009.240082.

Use of Open-Source Epidemic Intelligence for Infectious Disease Outbreaks, Ukraine, 2022

Use of Open-Source Epidemic Intelligence for Infectious Disease Outbreaks, Ukraine, 2022

Anjali Kannan et al. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Formal infectious disease surveillance in Ukraine has been disrupted by Russia's 2022 invasion, leading to challenges with tracking and containing epidemics. To analyze the effects of the war on infectious disease epidemiology, we used open-source data from EPIWATCH, an artificial intelligence early-warning system. We analyzed patterns of infectious diseases and syndromes before (November 1, 2021-February 23, 2022) and during (February 24-July 31, 2022) the conflict. We compared case numbers for the most frequently reported diseases with numbers from formal sources and found increases in overall infectious disease reports and in case numbers of cholera, botulism, tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, rabies, and salmonellosis during compared with before the invasion. During the conflict, although open-source intelligence captured case numbers for epidemics, such data (except for diphtheria) were unavailable/underestimated by formal surveillance. In the absence of formal surveillance during military conflicts, open-source data provide epidemic intelligence useful for infectious disease control.

Keywords: Ukraine; artificial intelligence; bacteria; epidemics; open source; outbreaks; viruses; zoonoses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Daily EPIWATCH (https://www.epiwatch.org) reports of outbreaks in Ukraine before and during Russia’s invasion, November 1, 2021–July 31, 2022.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of daily EPIWATCH (https://www.epiwatch.org) reports of outbreaks in Ukraine during Russia’s invasion (February 24, 2022–July 31, 2022) and in the same period of the previous year (February 24, 2021–July 31, 2021).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of reports of clinical syndromes per day before and during Russia’s invasion, Ukraine, November 1, 2021—July 31, 2022.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roborgh S, Coutts AP, Chellew P, Novykov V, Sullivan R. Conflict in Ukraine undermines an already challenged health system. Lancet. 2022;399:1365–7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00485-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mankof J. Russia’s War in Ukraine: Identity, History, and Conflict. Washington: Institute for National Strategic Studies; 2022.
    1. United Nations Department of Operational Support. Ukraine: report documents mounting deaths, rights violations. New York: United Nations; 2023.
    1. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. War and infectious diseases: brothers in arms. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22:563. 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00235-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nijman RG, Bressan S, Brandenberger J, Kaur D, Keitel K, Maconochie IK, et al. Update on the coordinated efforts of looking after the health care needs of children and young people fleeing the conflict zone of Ukraine presenting to European Emergency Departments—a joint statement of the European Society for Emergency Paediatrics and the European Academy of Paediatrics. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:897803. 10.3389/fped.2022.897803 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources