Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov;57(6):296-303.
doi: 10.1055/a-2374-2386. Epub 2024 Aug 22.

Twenty-Three Years of Declining Lithium Use: Analysis of a Pharmacoepidemiological Dataset from German-Speaking Countries

Affiliations

Twenty-Three Years of Declining Lithium Use: Analysis of a Pharmacoepidemiological Dataset from German-Speaking Countries

Waldemar Greil et al. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Pharmacoepidemiological data suggest that lithium prescriptions for bipolar disorder are gradually decreasing, with less attention having been paid to other indications.

Methods: We examined lithium prescriptions between 1994 and 2017 in data provided by the Drug Safety in Psychiatry Program AMSP, including psychiatric hospitals in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. We compared lithium use for different diagnoses before and after 2001 and in three periods (T1: 1994-2001, T2: 2002-2009, and T3: 2010-2017).

Results: In a total of 158,384 adult inpatients (54% female, mean age 47.4±17.0 years), we observed a statistically significant decrease in lithium prescriptions between 1994-2000 and 2001-2017 in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder from 7.7% to 5.1% and in patients with affective disorders from 16.8% to 9.6%. Decreases in use were also observed for diagnostic subgroups: schizoaffective disorder (ICD-10 F25: 27.8% to 17.4%), bipolar disorder (F31: 41.3% to 31%), depressive episode (F32: 8.1% to 3.4%), recurrent depression (F33: 17.9% to 7.5%, all: p<0.001) and emotionally unstable (borderline) personality disorder (6.3% to 3.9%, p=0.01). The results in T1 vs. T2 vs. T3 were for F25: 26.7% vs. 18.2% vs. 16.2%, F32: 7.7% vs. 4.2% vs. 2.7%, F33: 17.2% vs. 8.6% vs. 6.6% and for F31: 40.8% vs. 31.7% vs 30.0%, i. e. there was no further decrease for lithium use in bipolar disorder after 2002. Lithium's main psychotropic co-medications were quetiapine (21.1%), lorazepam (20.6%), and olanzapine (15.2%).

Discussion: In inpatients, the use of lithium has decreased in patients with bipolar disorder and also with various other psychiatric diagnoses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests S. Toto is the project manager of the AMSP program and a member of the advisory board for Otsuka and Janssen-Cilag and has received speaker’s honoraria from Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck/Otsuka, Recordati Pharma GmbH, ROVI, and Servier. G. Schoretsanitis has served as a consultant for Dexcel Pharma, HLS Therapeutics, Saladax and Thermo Fisher and has received speaker’s fees from HLS Therapeutics and Saladax. M. de Bardeci is Co-Founder and member of the board of directors of the company DeepPsy AG. All other authors state they have no conflicts of interest to declare.Role of the funding sourceThe authors did not receive any specific grants or funding for the present study. The AMSP drug safety program is facilitated by nonprofit associations in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The AMSP program has been supported with unrestricted educational and research grants since 1993 by the following companies: Austrian companies: Astra Zeneca Österreich GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Austria, Bristol-Myers Squibb GmbH, CSC Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Eli Lilly GmbH, Germania Pharma GmbH, GlaxoSmithKline Pharma GmbH, Janssen-Cilag Pharma GmbH, Lundbeck GmbH, Novartis Pharma GmbH, Pfizer Med Inform and Wyeth Lederle Pharma GmbH; German companies: Abbott GmbH & Co. KG, Aristo Pharma, AstraZeneca GmbH, Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH GE–O/R/N, Bayer Vital GmbH, Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Ciba Geigy GmbH, Desitin Arzneimittel GmbH, Duphar Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Eisai GmbH, Esparma GmbH Arzneimittel, GlaxoSmithKline Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Hoffmann-La Roche AG Medical Affairs, Janssen-Cilag GmbH, Janssen Research Foundation, Knoll Deutschland GmbH, Lilly Deutschland GmbH Niederlassung Bad Homburg, Lundbeck GmbH & Co. KG, Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nordmark Arzneimittel GmbH, Organon GmbH, Otsuka-Pharma Frankfurt, Pfizer GmbH, Pharmacia & Upjohn GmbH, Promonta Lundbeck Arzneimittel, Recordati Pharma GmbH, Rhone-Poulenc Rohrer, ROVI, Sanofi-Synthelabo GmbH, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland, Schering AG, SmithKlineBeecham Pharma GmbH, Solvay Arzneimittel GmbH, Synthelabo Arzneimittel GmbH, Dr. Wilmar Schwabe GmbH & Co., Thiemann Arzneimittel GmbH, Troponwerke GmbH & Co. KG, Upjohn GmbH, Wander Pharma GmbH and Wyeth-Pharma GmbH; Swiss companies: AHP (Schweiz) AG, AstraZeneca AG, Bristol-Myers Squibb AG, Desitin Pharma GmbH, Eli Lilly (Suisse) S.A., Essex Chemie AG, GlaxoSmithKline AG, Janssen-Cilag AG, Lundbeck (Suisse) AG, Organon AG, Pfizer AG, Pharmacia, Sanofi-Aventis (Suisse) S.A., Sanofi-Synthelabo SA, Servier SA, SmithKlineBeecham AG, Solvay Pharma AG, Wyeth AHP (Suisse) AG and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals AG.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Lithium prescriptions from 1994 to 2017 for various groups of psychotropic drugs. Legend: To study the evolution of psychotropic prescriptions in our study population, we grouped the prescribed drugs into antidepressant drugs (ADD), antipsychotic drugs (APD), tranquilizing drugs (TRD), hypnotic drugs (HYPD), lithium (LI), and antiepileptic drugs (AEP). For each of these groups, we calculated the number of patients who received a prescription. The exact values for the figure can be found in the supplement material ( Table S3 ).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Lithium prescriptions from 1994 to 2017 for various diagnoses: F25, F31, F32, F33. Legend:This figure shows the evolution of the percentage of patients prescribed lithium for the clinically most relevant diagnoses. We aggregated the prescriptions for two consecutive years and performed a linear regression. The slope of the regression of the four diagnoses yielded statistically significant results (p<0.01; Coeff (f): F25: − 0.6 (39) , F31: − 0.7 (36), F32: − 0.4 (35), F33: − 0.8 (70)).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yatham L N, Kennedy S H, Parikh S V et al.Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) 2018 guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2018;20:97–170. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ercis M, Ozerdem A, Singh B. When and how to use lithium augmentation for treating major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2023;84:23ac14813. - PubMed
    1. Leucht S, Helfer B, Dold M et al.Lithium for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015:CD003834. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antolin-Concha D, Lahteenvuo M, Vattulainen P et al.Suicide mortality and use of psychotropic drugs in patients hospitalized due to bipolar disorder: A Finnish nationwide cohort study. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:885–892. - PubMed
    1. Lewitzka U, Severus E, Bauer R et al.The suicide prevention effect of lithium: More than 20 years of evidence-a narrative review. Int J Bipolar Disord. 2015;3:32. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources