Subperiosteal abscess volume; an objective indication for surgical management in pediatrics
- PMID: 39174678
- DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08894-5
Subperiosteal abscess volume; an objective indication for surgical management in pediatrics
Abstract
Purpose: Subperiosteal abscess (SPA) can lead to devastating morbidity and mortality. Prompt management is important; however, the choice of management route is controversial. This study investigates factors associated with surgical management and defines a cut-off abscess volume prompting surgical intervention.
Methods: SPA cases presented to King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC) from 2014 to 2023 were reviewed. The surgical approach was studied in association with factors including age, gender, symptoms and signs, laboratory results, computed tomography (CT) characteristics, medications, and surgical approach. Multiple statistical tests were used for analysis, including student t-test, chi-square, multiple logistic regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Results: Patients were managed medically (n = 14, 45.16%) or surgically (n = 17, 54.84%). The average duration of antibiotics was 15 days. Superior SPA favors surgical management (OR = 6.722, CI [1.332-33.913], p = 0.029), along with the use of steroids (OR = 5.625, CI [0.915-34.572], p = 0.049), and abscess volume (OR = 10.003, CI [1.418-70.540], p < 0.001). However, the only factor attributing to a surgical decision on multivariate logistic regression analysis was abscess volume (OR = 5.126, CI [1.023-25.694], p = 0.047). SPA volume of ≥ 0.648 ml strongly prompts surgical management, with a sensitivity of 94.1% and a specificity of 71.4% (p = 0.000).
Conclusion: SPA volume increases the likelihood of surgical intervention by five times, especially when abscess volume is ≥ 0.648 ml.
Keywords: Abscess volume; Complicated sinusitis; Orbital cellulitis; Subperiosteal abscess.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Coudert A, Ayari-Khalfallah S, Suy P, Truy E (2018) Microbiology and antibiotic therapy of subperiosteal orbital abscess in children with acute ethmoiditis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 106:91–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.01.021 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Liao JC, Harris GJ (2015) Subperiosteal Abscess of the Orbit. Ophthalmology 122(3):639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.09.009 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bliss A, Craft A, Haber J, Inger H, Mousset M, Chiang T, Elmaraghy C (2024) Visual outcomes following orbital decompression for orbital infections. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 176:111824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111824 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Adil EA, Muir ME, Kawai K, Dombrowski ND, Cunningham MJ (2020) Pediatric Subperiosteal Abscess secondary to Acute sinusitis: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 130(12):2906–2912. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28570 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wong SJ, Levi J (2018) Management of pediatric orbital cellulitis: a systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 110:123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.05.006 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical