Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct;38(10):5483-5504.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11141-x. Epub 2024 Aug 22.

Scoping review for the SAGES EAES joint collaborative on sustainability in surgical practice

Affiliations

Scoping review for the SAGES EAES joint collaborative on sustainability in surgical practice

Bright Huo et al. Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Surgical care in the operating room (OR) contributes one-third of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in healthcare. The European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) initiated a joint Task Force to promote sustainability within minimally invasive gastrointestinal surgery.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted by searching MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase via Elsevier, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus on August 25th, 2023 to identify articles reporting on the impact of gastrointestinal surgical care on the environment. The objectives were to establish the terminology, outcome measures, and scope associated with sustainable surgical practice. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics.

Results: We screened 22,439 articles to identify 85 articles relevant to anesthesia, general surgical practice, and gastrointestinal surgery. There were 58/85 (68.2%) cohort studies and 12/85 (14.1%) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies. The most commonly measured outcomes were kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents (kg CO2eq), cost of resource consumption in US dollars or euros, surgical waste in kg, water consumption in liters, and energy consumption in kilowatt-hours. Surgical waste production and the use of anesthetic gases were among the largest contributors to the climate impact of surgical practice. Educational initiatives to educate surgical staff on the climate impact of surgery, recycling programs, and strategies to restrict the use of noxious anesthetic gases had the highest impact in reducing the carbon footprint of surgical care. Establishing green teams with multidisciplinary champions is an effective strategy to initiate a sustainability program in gastrointestinal surgery.

Conclusion: This review establishes standard terminology and outcome measures used to define the environmental footprint of surgical practices. Impactful initiatives to achieve sustainability in surgical practice will require education and multidisciplinary collaborations among key stakeholders including surgeons, researchers, operating room staff, hospital managers, industry partners, and policymakers.

Keywords: Climate change; Greenhouse gas emissions; Minimally invasive surgery; Recycling; Surgical waste; Sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Patricia Sylla is a consultant for Ethicon, Safeheal, Tissium, and Stryker. Nader Francis has consulted for Medtronic, Olympus, Applied Medical, Pharmacosmos and Fisher & Paykel Healthcare. Robert Lim is a consultant for Up-to-date. Shaneeta Johnson is a consultant for Baxter and Intuitive Surgical. Yewande Alimi is a consultant for Medtronic. Sheetal Nijihawan is a consultant for Smart SurgN. Benjamin Miller has research funding from the American Hernia Society. Drs. Bright Huo, M.M.M. Eussen, Stefania Marconi, Wendelyn M. Oslock, Nana Marfo, Oleksii Potapov, Ricardo J. Bello, Jonathan Vandeberg, Ryan P. Hall, Adnan Alseidi, Manuel Sanchez-Casalongue, Andrea Pietrabissa, Alberto Arezzo, Maximos Frountzas, Vittoria Bellatot, Paul Barach, Miran Rems, Sheetal Nijihhawan, Tejas S. Sathe, Benjamin Miller, Sarah Samreen, Jimmy Chung, and N.D. Bouvy have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Literature search overview
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overview of life-cycle assessment
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
10R model of circular economy
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Study findings aligned with the 10R model
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Hierarchy of evidence for sustainability research in surgery

References

    1. Costello A, Abbas M, Allen A, Ball S, Bell S, Bellamy R, Friel S, Groce N, Johnson A, Kett M, Lee M, Levy C, Maslin M, McCoy D, McGuire B, Montgomery H, Napier D, Pagel C, Patel J, de Oliveira JAP, Redclift N, Rees H, Rogger D, Scott J, Stephenson J, Twigg J, Wolff J, Patterson C (2009) Managing the health effects of climate change. Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission. The Lancet 373:1693–1733 - PubMed
    1. Rocque RJ, Beaudoin C, Ndjaboue R, Cameron L, Poirier-Bergeron L, Poulin-Rheault RA, Fallon C, Tricco AC, Witteman HO (2021) Health effects of climate change: an overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Open. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046333 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kwakye G, Brat GA, Makary MA (2011) Green Surgical Practices for Health Care - PubMed
    1. Eckelman MJ, Sherman J (2016) Environmental impacts of the US health care system and effects on public health. PLoS ONE. 10.1371/journal.pone.0157014 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shoham MA, Baker NM, Peterson ME, Fox P (2022) The environmental impact of surgery: a systematic review. Surgery (United States) 172:897–905. 10.1016/j.surg.2022.04.010 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources