Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 22;24(1):970.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11304-5.

A mixed method study exploring similarities and differences in general and social services-specific barriers to treatment-seeking among individuals with a problematic use of alcohol, cannabis, or gambling

Greta Schettini  1   2 , Philip Lindner  3   4 , Veronica Ekström  5 , Magnus Johansson  3   4
Affiliations

A mixed method study exploring similarities and differences in general and social services-specific barriers to treatment-seeking among individuals with a problematic use of alcohol, cannabis, or gambling

Greta Schettini et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Introduction: The treatment gap for addictive disorders is one of the largest in health care. Several studies have investigated barriers to treatment for different addictive disorders, but very few studies conducted have explored whether the barriers differ depending on substance or behavior or if they are common among all addictive disorders. In Sweden, addiction care is provided both by the healthcare and social services, where the latter is common, but also less popular. To our knowledge, there are no studies exploring whether the barriers are different depending on where the treatment is given.

Aim: The aim was to thoroughly explore both which general and social services-specific barriers to treatment that are common, which barriers that differs, and how the barriers are described among individuals with a problematic use of alcohol, cannabis and/or gambling.

Method: A mixed method convergent parallel design was conducted. For the quantitative measures, surveys including the validated Barriers to Treatment Inventory as well as questions regarding barriers in the Swedish multi-provider landscape, were collected from individuals with a problematic use of alcohol (n = 207), cannabis (n = 51), and gambling (n = 37). In parallel, 17 semi-structured interviews from the same population were conducted and analyzed with thematic analysis. Thereafter, the quantitative and qualitative data was compared, contrasted, and at last, interpreted.

Results: The quantitative data showed that the largest general barriers in all groups were privacy concern and poor availability, and the largest barriers for seeking help from the social services was stigma, unawareness of what is offered, and fear of consequences for all groups. The qualitative data resulted in five general barriers: stigma, ambivalence, accessibility, fear of consequences, and lack of knowledge about addiction and its' treatments, and three barriers specifically towards social services: social services reputation, fear of meeting acquaintances, and lack of knowledge. The themes were developed from data from all groups, but different aspects of the themes were mentioned by different groups.

Conclusion: There are details and aspects that differentiates both the general and social service-specific barriers to treatment between individuals with a problematic use of alcohol, cannabis, and gambling, but in large they perceive similar barriers.

Keywords: Addiction; Alcohol; Barriers to treatment; Cannabis; Gambling; Social services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Analytic pipeline that illustrates the process from the separate data collections and analysis to interpretation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The results from the Barriers to Treatment Inventory for all three groups
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The results from the Barriers to towards social service for all three groups
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andréasson S, Danielsson AK, Hallgren M. Severity of alcohol dependence in the Swedish adult population: association with consumption and social factors. Alcohol. 2013;47(1):21. 10.1016/j.alcohol.2012.10.001. 10.1016/j.alcohol.2012.10.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andréasson S, Danielsson AK, Wallhed-Finn S. Preferences regarding treatment for alcohol problems. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2013;48(6):694. 10.1093/alcalc/agt067. 10.1093/alcalc/agt067 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andréasson S, Finn SW, Bakshi AS. Barriers to treatment for alcohol dependence: a qualitative study. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2013;8(S1).10.1186/1940-0640-8-s1-a5.
    1. Barrio P, Reynolds J, García-Altés A, Gual A, Anderson P. Social costs of illegal drugs, alcohol and tobacco in the European Union: a systematic review. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2017;36(5):578. 10.1111/dar.12504. 10.1111/dar.12504 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bennett T, Holloway K. The causal connection between drug misuse and crime. British J Criminol. 2009;49(4):513. 10.1093/bjc/azp014.10.1093/bjc/azp014 - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources