Early Experience with Mesh Suture for DIEP Flap Abdominal Site Closures
- PMID: 39175518
- PMCID: PMC11340925
- DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006095
Early Experience with Mesh Suture for DIEP Flap Abdominal Site Closures
Abstract
Background: The gold standard of microsurgical breast reconstruction is the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap. As techniques have evolved, DIEP flaps have significantly reduced the morbidity previously caused by transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps. However, abdominal wall complications continue to persist after DIEP flap surgery, with bulge rates reported as high as 33%.
Methods: The first 25 patients undergoing DIEP flap surgery with the use of Duramesh (MSI, Chicago, Ill.) by the senior author were identified. A retrospective chart review of patient and surgical details was performed. Charts were reviewed for outcomes, including surgical site infections, surgical site events, incisional hernia formation, and/or bulge. Standard descriptive summary statistics were used for patient characteristics, surgical details, and primary and secondary outcomes.
Results: Twenty-five patients were reviewed. Average follow-up duration was 216 ± 39 days. One patient (4%) developed a surgical site infection, and four patients (16%) developed a surgical site event. One patient developed a bulge, but no patients developed an incisional hernia.
Conclusions: Duramesh mesh suture provides a promising opportunity for DIEP surgeons to minimize both abdominal wall morbidity and mesh-related complications. Mesh suture can be used in a similar fashion as other sutures to perform primary closure of the anterior rectus sheath while also providing force-distribution benefits typically unique to planar mesh. This pilot study suggests that Duramesh is a safe, simple alternative to existing techniques in DIEP flap surgery and can be considered by microsurgeons to reduce fascial dehiscence, bulge, and/or hernia formation.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Conflict of interest statement
The Northwestern Department of Surgery received an unrestricted educational grant of $15,000 from MSI, which has partially supported Dr. Hackenberger’s salary. Dr. Howard is an investor in MSI and owns four shares of stock in the company. All the other authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Aug;126(2):367-374. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de1b7e. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010. PMID: 20679822
-
Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction.Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Apr;58(4):359-63. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000239818.28900.81. Ann Plast Surg. 2007. PMID: 17413875
-
Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Aug;110(2):466-75; discussion 476-7. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200208000-00015. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002. PMID: 12142662
-
Postoperative Abdominal Bulge and Hernia Rates in Patients Undergoing Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Apr 1;86(4):476-484. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002538. Ann Plast Surg. 2021. PMID: 33720921
-
Abdominal wall following free TRAM or DIEP flap reconstruction: a meta-analysis and critical review.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Sep;124(3):752-764. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818b7533. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009. PMID: 19342994 Review.
References
-
- Granzow JW, Levine JL, Chiu ES, et al. . Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: history and an update on current technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:571–579. - PubMed
-
- Lee BT, Agarwal JP, Ascherman JA, et al. . Evidence-based clinical practice guideline: autologous breast reconstruction with DIEP or pedicled TRAM abdominal flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:651e–664e. - PubMed
-
- Masoomi H, Hanson SE, Clemens MW, et al. . Autologous breast reconstruction trends in the United States: using the nationwide inpatient sample database. Ann Plast Surg. 2021;87:242–247. - PubMed
-
- Asaad M, Mitchell D, Slovacek C, et al. . Surgical outcomes of vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap pelvic reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023. [E-pub ahead of print]. - PubMed
-
- Baumann DP, Butler CE. Component separation improves outcomes in VRAM flap donor sites with excessive fascial tension. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1573–1580. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials