PET/CT Response Assessment in Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma: Does Deauville Score 3 Reflect Negativity?
- PMID: 39178011
- DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000002943
PET/CT Response Assessment in Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma: Does Deauville Score 3 Reflect Negativity?
Abstract
Background: FDG PET is required for the staging and response evaluation of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of pediatric patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma based on interim PET CT assessments of early response following second-cycle chemotherapy using the Deauville score (DS). It also determines whether DS-3 is providing an adequate or inadequate response.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 504 pediatric patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma who were treated with chemotherapy based on the Euro-Net protocol at the Children Cancer Hospital Egypt from March 2019 till the end of October 2022.
Results: Patients with adequate response DS 1/2 and DS 3 showed nearly the same 3-year event-free survival (EFS) of 91.9% and 91.5%, respectively, compared with those patients with inadequate response DS 4/5, who showed an EFS of 80.4% ( P =0.001). Patients with a DS 3 at interim PET evaluation were considered negative as DS 1/2. Patients of DS 3 group who did not receive radiotherapy had a much worse 3-year EFS by the existence of positive B symptoms, an ESR>30, or an advanced stage. Radiation therapy did not improve the 3-year EFS in patients with an inadequate response (DS4/5) and poor prognostic characteristics. They still need more advanced treatment.
Conclusion: DS 1/2 and DS 3 had about the same 3-year EFS, which is better than the 3-year EFS of patients with DS 4/5. Therefore, we can classify DS 3 as having negative FDG PET CT uptake.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- McCarten KM, Nadel HR, Shulkin BL, et al. Imaging for diagnosis, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Pediatr Radiol. 2019;49:1545–1564.
-
- Gallamini A, Barrington SF, Biggi A, et al. The predictive role of interim positron emission tomography for Hodgkin lymphoma treatment outcome is confirmed using the interpretation criteria of the Deauville five-point scale. Haematologica. 2014;99:1107–1113.
-
- Hutchings M, Kostakoglu L, Zaucha JM, et al. In vivo treatment sensitivity testing with positron emission tomography/computed tomography after one cycle of chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2705–2711.
-
- Mauz-Körholz C, Landman-Parker J, Balwierz W, et al. Response-adapted omission of radiotherapy and comparison of consolidation chemotherapy in children and adolescents with intermediate-stage and advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (EuroNetPHL-C1): a titration study with an open-label, embedded, multinational, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23:125–137.
-
- Radford J, Illidge T, Counsell N, et al. Results of a trial of PET-directed therapy for early-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1598–1607.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous