Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 23;3(8):e0000561.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000561. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Community-engaged artificial intelligence research: A scoping review

Affiliations

Community-engaged artificial intelligence research: A scoping review

Tyler J Loftus et al. PLOS Digit Health. .

Abstract

The degree to which artificial intelligence healthcare research is informed by data and stakeholders from community settings has not been previously described. As communities are the principal location of healthcare delivery, engaging them could represent an important opportunity to improve scientific quality. This scoping review systematically maps what is known and unknown about community-engaged artificial intelligence research and identifies opportunities to optimize the generalizability of these applications through involvement of community stakeholders and data throughout model development, validation, and implementation. Embase, PubMed, and MEDLINE databases were searched for articles describing artificial intelligence or machine learning healthcare applications with community involvement in model development, validation, or implementation. Model architecture and performance, the nature of community engagement, and barriers or facilitators to community engagement were reported according to PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Of approximately 10,880 articles describing artificial intelligence healthcare applications, 21 (0.2%) described community involvement. All articles derived data from community settings, most commonly by leveraging existing datasets and sources that included community subjects, and often bolstered by internet-based data acquisition and subject recruitment. Only one article described inclusion of community stakeholders in designing an application-a natural language processing model that detected cases of likely child abuse with 90% accuracy using harmonized electronic health record notes from both hospital and community practice settings. The primary barrier to including community-derived data was small sample sizes, which may have affected 11 of the 21 studies (53%), introducing substantial risk for overfitting that threatens generalizability. Community engagement in artificial intelligence healthcare application development, validation, or implementation is rare. As healthcare delivery occurs primarily in community settings, investigators should consider engaging community stakeholders in user-centered design, usability, and clinical implementation studies to optimize generalizability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Community engagement themes and their role in artificial intelligence-enabled healthcare applications.

References

    1. Emanuel EJ, Wachter RM. Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Will the Value Match the Hype? JAMA. 2019;321(23):2281–2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4914 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loftus TJ, Tighe PJ, Filiberto AC, Efron PA, Brakenridge SC, Mohr AM, et al.. Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-Making. JAMA Surg. 2019. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Rus D, Meireles OR. Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: Promises and Perils. Ann Surg. 2018;268(1):70–6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002693 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angwin J, Larson J, Mattu S, Kirchner L. Machine bias. ProPublica. 2016. May 23:Accessed 24 Jan 2019 [https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-crim...].
    1. Loftus TJ, Tighe PJ, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, Davis JP, Ruppert MM, Ren Y, et al.. Ideal algorithms in healthcare: Explainable, dynamic, precise, autonomous, fair, and reproducible. PLOS Digital Health. 2022;1(1):e0000006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources