Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct;15(5):1013-1024.
doi: 10.1055/a-2402-5832. Epub 2024 Aug 23.

"It Attracts Your Eyes and Brain": Refining Visualizations for Shared Decision-Making with Heart Failure Patients

Affiliations

"It Attracts Your Eyes and Brain": Refining Visualizations for Shared Decision-Making with Heart Failure Patients

Sabrina Mangal et al. Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Background: N-of-1 trials have emerged as a personalized approach to patient-centered care, where patients can compare evidence-based treatments using their own data. However, little is known about optimal methods to present individual-level data from medication-related N-of-1 trials to patients to promote decision-making.

Objectives: We conducted qualitative interviews with patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction undergoing N-of-1 trials to iterate, refine, and optimize a patient-facing data visualization tool for displaying the results of N-of-1 medication trials. The goal of optimizing this tool was to promote patients' understanding of their individual health information and to ultimately facilitate shared decision-making about continuing or discontinuing their medication.

Methods: We conducted 32 semistructured qualitative interviews with 9 participants over the course of their participation in N-of-1 trials. The N-of-1 trials were conducted to facilitate a comparison of continuing versus discontinuing a β-blocker. Interviews were conducted in person or over the phone after each treatment period to evaluate participant perspectives on a data visualization tool prototype. Data were coded using directed content analysis by two independent reviewers and included a third reviewer to reach a consensus when needed. Major themes were extracted and iteratively incorporated into the patient-facing data visualization tool.

Results: Nine participants provided feedback on how their data were displayed in the visualization tool. After qualitative analysis, three major themes emerged that informed our final interface. Participants preferred: (1) clearly stated individual symptom scores, (2) a reference image with labels to guide their interpretation of symptom information, and (3) qualitative language over numbers alone conveying the meaning of changes in their scores (e.g., better, worse).

Conclusion: Feedback informed the design of a patient-facing data visualization tool for medication-related N-of-1 trials. Future work should include usability and comprehension testing of this interface on a larger scale.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

P.G. has received consulting fees from Sensorum Health and has received personal fees for medicolegal consulting related to HF.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bell S K, Mejilla R, Anselmo M et al.When doctors share visit notes with patients: a study of patient and doctor perceptions of documentation errors, safety opportunities and the patient-doctor relationship. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(04):262–270. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Open Notes.U.S. Federal Rules Mandates Open NotesAccessed May 11, 2022 at:https://www.opennotes.org/onc-federal-rule/
    1. HealthIT.gov.Information BlockingAccessed April 18, 2022 at:https://www.healthit.gov/topic/information-blocking
    1. Marzban S, Najafi M, Agolli A, Ashrafi E.Impact of patient engagement on healthcare quality: a scoping review J Patient Exp 2022923743735221125439 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krist A H, Tong S T, Aycock R A, Longo D R. Engaging patients in decision-making and behavior change to promote prevention. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:284–302. - PMC - PubMed