Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Mar;101(3):589-597.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.08.015. Epub 2024 Aug 22.

Evaluating no fixation, endoscopic suture fixation, and an over-the-scope clip for anchoring fully covered self-expandable metal stents in benign upper GI conditions: a comparative multicenter international study (with video)

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluating no fixation, endoscopic suture fixation, and an over-the-scope clip for anchoring fully covered self-expandable metal stents in benign upper GI conditions: a comparative multicenter international study (with video)

Amit Mehta et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Background and aims: Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) are widely used in benign upper GI conditions, but stent migration remains a limitation. An over-the-scope clip (OTSC) device (Stentfix {SF], Ovesco Endoscopy) for stent anchoring has recently been developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of OTSC fixation on FCSEMS migration rate.

Methods: In this retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent FCSEMS placement for benign upper GI conditions from January 2011 to October 2022 at 16 centers, the primary outcome was rate of stent migration. The secondary outcomes were clinical success and adverse events.

Results: A total of 311 (no fixation [NF] 122, SF 94, endoscopic suturing [ES] 95) patients underwent 316 stenting procedures. Compared with the NF group (n = 49, 39%), the rates of stent migration were significantly lower in the SF (n = 16, 17%, P = .001) and ES (n = 23, 24%, P = .01) groups. The rates of stent migration were not different between the SF and ES groups (P = .2). On multivariate analysis, SF (odds ratio [OR], 0.34, 95% CI, 0.17-0.70, P < .01) and ES (OR, 0.46, 95% CI, 0.23-0.91; P = .02) were independently associated with decreased risk of stent migration. Compared with the NF group (n = 64; 52%), there were higher rates of clinical success in the SF (n = 64; 68%; P = .03) and ES (n = 66; 69%; P = .02) groups. There was no significant difference in the rates of adverse events among the 3 groups.

Conclusion: Stent fixation using OTSCs is safe and effective at preventing stent migration and may also result in improved clinical response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: B. Confer: consultant for Boston Scientific. J.J. Pineda-Bonilla: consultant for Boston Scientific. R. Pawa: consultant for Boston Scientific and Cook Medical. S. Pawa: consultant for Boston Scientific. R.E. Kim: consultant for Boston Scientific and Cook Medical. H.S. Khara: consultant for Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, ConMed, Pentax, Medtronic, and Olympus. G.O. Spaun: consultant for Boston Scientific. K.H. Park: consultant for Olympus, Endorobotics, MicroTech. D.D. Diehl: consultant for Boston Scientific, Micro-Tech, Lumendi, Merit, Pentax, Actuated Medical, Steris, and Olympus. P. Kedia: consultant for Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Olympus. M.A. Khashab: consultant for Boston Scientific and Olympus; royalties from Elsevier and UpToDate. The other authors disclosed no financial relationships.

LinkOut - more resources