Association between vitamin D level and cataract: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 39179900
- PMCID: PMC11807021
- DOI: 10.1007/s00417-024-06592-w
Association between vitamin D level and cataract: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Purpose: The association between serum vitamin D level and cataract remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the association between vitamin D level and cataract.
Methods: In this study, articles in the PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched up to 30 August 2023 and 626 articles were screened. Four studies involving a total of 10,928 subjects with cataract and 10,117 control subjects met the inclusion criteria.
Results: Decreased serum vitamin D level was associated with higher incidence of cataract (P = 0.047; MD: -4.87; 95%CI: [-9.67, -0.07]). In the subgroup analysis by sex, a significant association was found between serum vitamin D level and cataract in both male (P = 0.01, MD: -2.15,95%CI: [-3.83, -0.46]) and female (P < 0.01; MD: -6.67,95%CI: [-8.20, -5.14]).In the subgroup analysis by the types of cataract, significant association was found between serum vitamin D level and nuclear (P < 0.01; MD: -10.48; 95%CI: [-12.72, -8.24]) and posterior subcapsular cataract (P = 0.02; MD: -6.05; 95%CI: [-11.30, -0.80]) but not in cortical cataract (P = 0.14; MD: -6.74; 95%CI: [-15.70, 2.22]).
Conclusion: This meta-analysis revealed potential association between serum vitamin D level and cataract, more significant in female, and the subtypes of nuclear and posterior subcapsular cataract.
Keywords: Cataract; Serum vitamin D level; Types of cataract; Vitamin D.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical approval: Regarding this systematic review and meta-analysis, no approval was required from an authorized Medical Ethics Committee since this is a review of priorly published studies with no patient identifying information. Informed consent: All authors also ascertain that informed consent was confirmed to had been obtained from all individual participants involved in the included studies. Conflict of Interest: All authors declare no conflict of interests.
Figures
References
-
- Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, Ackland P, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, Das A, Jonas JB, Keeffe J, Kempen JH, Leasher J, Limburg H, Naidoo K, Pesudovs K, Silvester A, Stevens GA, Tahhan N, Wong TY, Taylor HR (2017) Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Global Health 5(12):e1221–e1234. 10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30393-5 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Choquet H, Melles RB, Anand D, Yin J, Cuellar-Partida G, Wang W, Hoffmann TJ, Nair KS, Hysi PG, Lachke SA, Jorgenson E (2021) A large multiethnic GWAS meta-analysis of cataract identifies new risk loci and sex-specific effects. Nature Commun 12(1):3595. 10.1038/s41467-021-23873-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
