Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov;42(11):1287-1300.
doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01420-9. Epub 2024 Aug 24.

Bring Out Your Dead: A Review of the Cost Minimisation Approach in Health Technology Assessment Submissions to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee

Affiliations
Review

Bring Out Your Dead: A Review of the Cost Minimisation Approach in Health Technology Assessment Submissions to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee

Zachary Tirrell et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: Published literature has levied criticism against the cost-minimisation analysis (CMA) approach to economic evaluation over the past two decades, with multiple papers declaring its 'death'. However, since introducing the requirements for economic evaluations as part of health technology (HTA) decision-making in 1992, the cost-minimisation analysis (CMA) approach has been widely used to inform recommendations about the public subsidy of medicines in Australia. This research aimed to highlight the breadth of use of CMA in Australia and assess the influence of preconditions for the approach on subsidy recommendations METHODS: Relevant information was extracted from Public Summary Documents of Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) meetings in Australia considering submissions for the subsidy of medicines that included a CMA and were assessed between July 2005 and December 2022. A generalised linear model was used to explore the relationship between whether medicines were recommended and variables that reflected the primary preconditions for using CMA set out in the published PBAC Methodology Guidelines. Other control variables were selected through the Bolasso Method. Subgroup analysis was undertaken which replicated this modelling process.

Results: While the potential for inferior safety or efficacy reduced the likelihood of recommendation (p < 0.01), the effect sizes suggest that the requirements for CMA were not requisite for recommendation.

Conclusion: The Australian practice of CMA does not strictly align with the PBAC Methodology Guidelines and the theoretically appropriate application of CMA. However, within the confines of a deliberative HTA decision-making process that balances values and judgement with available evidence, this may be considered acceptable, particularly if stakeholders consider the current approach delivers sufficient clarity of process and enables patients to access medicines at an affordable cost.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.N., M.H., and B.P. are evaluators of submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) for the Australian Government. S.L. is a full-time employee of Amgen Inc. The views expressed are the authors’ and do not reflect the views of the PBAC, the Australian Government, or Amgen Inc. Z.T. has no (non-funding) conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA 2020 Flow Diagram for included PSDs

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Charlton V et al. We need to talk about values: a proposed framework for the articulation of normative reasoning in health technology assessment. Health Econ Policy Law. 2023:1–21. - PubMed
    1. Australian Government Department of Health, Guidelines for preparing a submission to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. 2016: Canberra.
    1. Jarrow RA. Risk management models: construction, testing, usage. J Deriv. 2011;18(4):89–98.
    1. O’Brien BJ, Briggs AH. Analysis of uncertainty in health care cost-effectiveness studies: an introduction to statistical issues and methods. Stat Methods Med Res. 2002;11(6):455–68. - PubMed
    1. Drummond MF. Studies in economic appraisal in health care. 1981.

LinkOut - more resources