Cost and Cost Effectiveness of Treatments for Psoriatic Arthritis: An Updated Systematic Literature Review
- PMID: 39182010
- DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01428-1
Cost and Cost Effectiveness of Treatments for Psoriatic Arthritis: An Updated Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
Background: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory disease characterised by a variety of clinical manifestations. Considering the economic burden posed by PsA and the increasing number of treatment options, economic evaluations are required to better allocate available resources. This work aims to update a previous published literature review on PsA cost-of-illness and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Methods: A search was performed of English-language literature between January 2017 and March 20, 2024 in Medline/PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library using the terms 'psoriatic arthritis', 'cost of illness' and 'cost effectiveness'. Data on decision model, time horizon, population, treatment options, perspective, type of costs, relevant results and authors' conclusion were extracted from the reviewed articles. Finally, the quality of the included studies was evaluated.
Results: Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria: 16 cost-of-illness and 11 cost-effectiveness/cost-utility analyses. PsA is characterised by high direct and indirect costs. Drug costs as well as hospitalisation and absenteeism were the major drivers of the observed costs. The cost-effectiveness analyses reported the dominance or the cost effectiveness of biologic therapies compared with non-biologic PsA treatment. Biological options like bimekizumab and ixekizumab have demonstrated a better cost-effectiveness profile in PsA patients compared with other treatments (i.e., other biological treatments).
Conclusions: There was an increased number of economic evaluations compared with the previous review. PsA is still associated with significant economic burden worldwide. The main cost was represented by therapies, specifically biological therapies. Amongst the biological therapies, bimekizumab and ixekizumab appear to provide the most economic benefit. Finally, new economic studies are needed to enrich knowledge on the economic burden of subgroups of PsA patients as well as early treatment of PsA with new therapies.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Cost and Cost Effectiveness of Treatments for Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review.Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 May;36(5):567-589. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0618-5. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018. PMID: 29441473
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Secukinumab Versus Other Biologics in the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: An Argentinean Perspective.Value Health Reg Issues. 2019 Dec;20:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 May 16. Value Health Reg Issues. 2019. PMID: 31103950
-
Golimumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a NICE single technology appraisal.Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Apr;30(4):257-70. doi: 10.2165/11595920-000000000-00000. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012. PMID: 22283690 Review.
-
Treatment Switch Patterns and Healthcare Costs in Biologic-Naive Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis.Adv Ther. 2020 May;37(5):2098-2115. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01262-9. Epub 2020 Mar 5. Adv Ther. 2020. PMID: 32141018 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of biologic treatments for psoriatic arthritis: can we make better use of patient data registries?Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Aug;36(8):1803-1810. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3703-9. Epub 2017 Jun 13. Clin Rheumatol. 2017. PMID: 28612241 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous