Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb;30(2):619-628.
doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02708-0. Epub 2024 Aug 25.

Network state dynamics underpin basal craving in a transdiagnostic population

Affiliations

Network state dynamics underpin basal craving in a transdiagnostic population

Jean Ye et al. Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Emerging fMRI methods quantifying brain dynamics present an opportunity to capture how fluctuations in brain responses give rise to individual variations in affective and motivation states. Although the experience and regulation of affective states affect psychopathology, their underlying time-varying brain responses remain unclear. Here, we present a novel framework to identify network states matched to an affective experience and examine how the dynamic engagement of these network states contributes to this experience. We apply this framework to investigate network state dynamics underlying basal craving, an affective experience with important clinical implications. In a transdiagnostic sample of healthy controls and individuals diagnosed with or at risk for craving-related disorders (total N = 252), we utilized connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM) to identify brain networks predictive of basal craving. An edge-centric timeseries approach was leveraged to quantify the moment-to-moment engagement of the craving-positive and craving-negative subnetworks during independent scan runs. We found that dynamic markers of network engagement, namely more persistence in a craving-positive network state and less dwelling in a craving-negative network state, characterized individuals with higher craving. We replicated the latter results in a separate dataset, incorporating distinct participants (N = 173) and experimental stimuli. The associations between basal craving and network state dynamics were consistently observed even when craving-predictive networks were defined in the replication dataset. These robust findings suggest that network state dynamics underpin individual differences in basal craving. Our framework additionally presents a new avenue to explore how the moment-to-moment engagement of behaviorally meaningful network states supports our affective experiences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest with respect to the content of this manuscript. Dr. Potenza discloses that he has consulted for and advised Game Day Data, Addiction Policy Forum, AXA, Idorsia, Baria-Tek, and Opiant Therapeutics; been involved in a patent application with Yale University and Novartis; received research support from the Mohegan Sun Casino and the Connecticut Council on Problem Gambling; consulted for or advised legal and gambling entities on issues related to impulse control and addictive behaviors; provided clinical care related to impulse-control and addictive behaviors; performed grant reviews; edited journals/journal sections; given academic lectures in grand rounds, CME events, and other clinical/scientific venues; and generated books or chapters for publishers of mental health texts. Dr. Sinha discloses her consultation with Embera Neurotherapeutics and also receiving research materials and support from Aelis Farma, CT Pharma and Aptinyx Inc. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The procedures were approved by the Yale Medical School Institutional Review Board (IRB). All participants provided written informed consent. Studies were performed following procedures approved by the IRB.

Update of

References

    1. Hutchison RM, Womelsdorf T, Allen EA, Bandettini PA, Calhoun VD, Corbetta M, et al. Dynamic functional connectivity: promise, issues, and interpretations. NeuroImage. 2013;80:360–78. - PubMed
    1. Preti MG, Bolton TA, Van De Ville D. The dynamic functional connectome: state-of-the-art and perspectives. NeuroImage. 2017;160:41–54. - PubMed
    1. Lurie DJ, Kessler D, Bassett DS, Betzel RF, Breakspear M, Kheilholz S, et al. Questions and controversies in the study of time-varying functional connectivity in resting fMRI. Netw Neurosci. 2020;4:30–69. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Tobia MJ, Hayashi K, Ballard G, Gotlib IH, Waugh CE. Dynamic functional connectivity and individual differences in emotions during social stress. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38:6185–205. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Gaviria J, Rey G, Bolton T, Delgado J, Van De Ville D, Vuilleumier P. Brain functional connectivity dynamics at rest in the aftermath of affective and cognitive challenges. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021;42:1054–69. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources