Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun 28:22:100444.
doi: 10.1016/j.ese.2024.100444. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Keratinous and corneous-based products towards circular bioeconomy: A research review

Affiliations
Review

Keratinous and corneous-based products towards circular bioeconomy: A research review

Giovanni Davide Barone et al. Environ Sci Ecotechnol. .

Abstract

Keratins and corneous proteins are key components of biomaterials used in a wide range of applications and are potential substitutes for petrochemical-based products. Horns, hooves, feathers, claws, and similar animal tissues are abundant sources of α-keratin and corneous β-proteins, which are by-products of the food industry. Their close association with the meat industry raises environmental and ethical concerns regarding their disposal. To promote an eco-friendly and circular use of these materials in novel applications, efforts have focused on recovering these residues to develop sustainable, non-animal-related, affordable, and scalable procedures. Here, we review and examine biotechnological methods for extracting and expressing α-keratins and corneous β-proteins in microorganisms. This review highlights consolidated research trends in biomaterials, medical devices, food supplements, and packaging, demonstrating the keratin industry's potential to create innovative value-added products. Additionally, it analyzes the state of the art of related intellectual property and market size to underscore the potential within a circular bioeconomic model.

Keywords: Alpha-keratin; Biotechnology; Corneous beta-protein; Environmentally sustainable technology; Resource recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Image 1
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Two main strategies for α-keratin and corneous β-proteins production: biotechnological and waste-based. Schematic representation of two approaches for α-keratin and corneous β-proteins production, (i) biotechnological approach and (ii) utilisation of wasted corneous and keratinous materials, and subsequent downstream steps to generate products. Ori: origin of replication. AB: antibiotic.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic representation of α-keratin and corneous β-protein structure levels. The secondary structure assembles in α-helix or a β-sheet, and the structures for the amino acid glycine (gly), serine (ser), leucine (leu), and glutamate (glu) are shown. Ca.: circa.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Different procedures to obtain α-keratin and corneous β-protein and typical values of their main properties. Extraction procedures from natural sources (chemical hydrolysis and heating, enzymatic and microbial treatments, dissolution in ionic liquids, and microwaving techniques) and chemical-physical properties (young modules, fracture strength, and toughness) are shown. Gpa: gigapascal. Mpa: megapascal. Ca.: circa.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Market size in the United States between 2020 and 2030 of α-keratins and corneous β-proteins. The economic values for the hydrolysed (dark green and light orange) and other types (light cyan and dark orange) are shown. The millions (M) of United States Dollars (USD) for 2020, 2021, and 2022 correspond to $212 M, $219 M, and $232 M. The estimated values between 2024 and 2030 are illustrated in light (hydrolysed) and dark (other types) orange. The values are reported according to the content shown in Grand View Research: “Keratin Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Product (Hydrolysed, Others), By Application By Source (Food & Beverages, Pharmaceutical & Healthcare), By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2022–2030” [168].

References

    1. de Wit M., Hoogzaad J., Ramkumar S., Friedl H., Douma A. The Circularity Gap Report: an analysis of the circular state of the global economy. Circ.Econ.Sust. 2018;1–36
    1. Govindan K., Hasanagic M. A systematic review on drivers, barriers and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018;56:278–311. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141. - DOI
    1. Byrial Jensen P., Nhu Laursen L., Møller Haase L. Barriers to product longevity: a review of business, product development and user perspectives. J. Clean. Prod. 2021;313 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127951. - DOI
    1. Goyal S., Chauhan S., Mishra P. Circular economy research: a bibliometric analysis (2000–2019) and future research insights. J. Clean. Prod. 2021;287 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125011. - DOI
    1. Ferraz D., Pyka A. Circular economy, bioeconomy, and sustainable development goals: a systematic literature review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023 doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29632-0. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources