Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 26;16(7):e65444.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.65444. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Enhancing Clinical Diagnosis With Convolutional Neural Networks: Developing High-Accuracy Deep Learning Models for Differentiating Thoracic Pathologies

Affiliations

Enhancing Clinical Diagnosis With Convolutional Neural Networks: Developing High-Accuracy Deep Learning Models for Differentiating Thoracic Pathologies

Kartik K Goswami et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background The use of computational technology in medicine has allowed for an increase in the accuracy of clinical diagnosis, reducing errors through additional layers of oversight. Artificial intelligence technologies present the potential to further augment and expedite the accuracy, quality, and efficiency at which diagnosis can be made when used as an adjunctive tool. Such techniques, if found to be accurate and reliable in their diagnostic acuity, can be implemented to foster better clinical decision-making, improving patient quality of care while reducing healthcare costs. Methodology This study implemented convolution neural networks to develop a deep learning model capable of differentiating normal chest X-rays from those indicating pneumonia, tuberculosis, cardiomegaly, and COVID-19. There were 3,063 normal chest X-rays, 3,098 pneumonia chest X-rays, 2,920 COVID-19 chest X-rays, 2,214 chest X-rays, and 554 tuberculosis chest X-rays from Kaggle that were used for training and validation. The model was trained to recognize patterns within the chest X-rays to efficiently recognize these diseases within patients to be treated on time. Results The results indicated a success rate of 98.34% incorrect detections, exemplifying a high degree of accuracy. There are limitations to this study. Training models require hundreds to thousands of samples, and due to potential variability in image scanning equipment and techniques from which the images are sourced, the model could have learned to interpret external noise and unintended details which can adversely impact accuracy. Conclusions Further studies that implement more universal database-sourced images with similar image scanning techniques, assess diverse but related medical conditions, and the utilization of repeat trials can help assess the reliability of the model. These results highlight the potential of machine learning algorithms for disease detection with chest X-rays.

Keywords: chest x-ray; deep learning artificial intelligence; general internal medicine; general radiology; thoracic radiology; x-ray analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve human participants or tissue. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Normal chest X-ray.
An example of the normal chest X-ray used to train our model. Chest X-ray images. Accessed on January 5, 2024, from https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/tolgadincer/labeled-chest-xray-images.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Confusion matrix.
The figure shows our true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative ratios calculated by our confusion matrix.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Run 1 predictive ability of the model.
This graph shows our model’s accuracy and functionality during our first run.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Run 2 predictive ability of the model.
This graph shows the accuracy of our model improving on run 2 as the model learns from its previous run.

References

    1. Utility of artificial intelligence in a binary classification of soft tissue tumors. Di J, Hickey C, Bumgardner C, et al. J Pathol Inform. 2024;15:100368. - PMC - PubMed
    1. AI applications in musculoskeletal imaging: a narrative review. Gitto S, Serpi F, Albano D, Risoleo G, Fusco S, Messina C, Sconfienza LM. Eur Radiol Exp. 2024;8:22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Failing to make the grade: conventional cardiac allograft rejection grading criteria are inadequate for predicting rejection severity. Arabyarmohammadi S, Yuan C, Viswanathan VS, et al. Circ Heart Fail. 2024;17:0. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The role of molecular imaging in detecting fibrosis in Crohn's disease. Alyami AS, Madkhali Y, Majrashi NA, et al. Ann Med. 2024;56:2313676. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma resectability assessment: could a visual aid tool save both patients and radiology residents? Rogalla P, Cadour F, Kim TK. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2024:8465371241230905. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources