Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 21;12(3):193-201.
doi: 10.5114/cipp/166751. eCollection 2024.

Attributional and attentional patterns in the perception of ambiguous harmful encounters involving peer and authority figures

Anna Zajenkowska  1 , Ewa Duda  1 , Claire Lawrence  2 , Marta Bodecka  1   2
Affiliations

Attributional and attentional patterns in the perception of ambiguous harmful encounters involving peer and authority figures

Anna Zajenkowska et al. Curr Issues Personal Psychol. .

Abstract

Background: Self-construal influences the way people ascribe blame to victims, but it is not clear whether the same applies to harm doers, especially those in a position of authority.

Participants and procedure: We examined (N = 122, men n = 60) participants' ascriptions of both blame and intentionality to harm doers (authority figure versus peer) while priming self-construal (relational versus individual self). Using eye-tracking, we explored whether priming relational self, compared to individual self, affects the allocation of attention to faces versus objects.

Results: Although no effects of priming were found, the type of harm doer influenced the way people interpreted harmful social encounters. Participants attributed both greater intentionality and blame to peer than authority perpetrators. Also, in the case of peer perpetrators, blame ascription was higher than judgements of intentionality, which was the opposite pattern for authority perpetrators, where judgements of intentionality were greater than ascribed blame. In regard to encoding, participants independently of the type of harm doer looked significantly longer at faces than at objects in violent scenes.

Conclusions: Our results suggest the status of perpetrator influences judgements of harm independently of intrapersonal factors, such as primed self-construal. Moreover, people perceived as authority figures are not blamed for the hurtful action, despite attributed intentionality.

Keywords: authority figure; blame; encoding; eye-tracking; harm-doers; intentionality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: a practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. Reis & C. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). Cambridge University Press.
    1. Bègue, L., Beauvois, J. L., Courbet, D., Oberlé, D., Lepage, J., & Duke, A. A. (2015). Personality predicts obedience in a Milgram paradigm. Journal of Personality, 83, 299–306. 10.1111/jopy.12104 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bodecka, M., Jonason, K. P., & Zajenkowska, A. (2022). Hostile attribution biases in vulnerable narcissists depends on the socio-relational context. Journal of Individual Differences, 43, 70–78. 10.1027/1614-0001/a000354 - DOI
    1. Chen, S., Boucher, H. C., & Tapias, M. P. (2006). The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 151–179. 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.151 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cooper, W. H., & Withey, M. J. (2009). The strong situation hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 62–72. 10.1177/108886830832937 - DOI - PubMed