Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 9:11:1429168.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1429168. eCollection 2024.

Strengthening surgical healthcare research capacity in sub-Saharan Africa: impact of a research training programme in Nigeria

Affiliations

Strengthening surgical healthcare research capacity in sub-Saharan Africa: impact of a research training programme in Nigeria

Emmanuel A Ameh et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: Limited research capacity has contributed to the lack of high-quality research from low-and middle-income countries. This is compounded by limited research training opportunities. Research capacity scale-up training was deployed as part of the implementation of the National Surgical, Obstetrics, Anaesthesia, and Nursing Plan for Nigeria. We report the impact of this locally contextualized efforts to scale up research capacity in sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods: This is an evaluation of the training of 65 participants in research, grant writing and manuscript writing and publication. Pre- and post-training surveys using a 5-point Likert scale and open-ended questions were administered to evaluate the impact of the programme.

Results: There were 39 (60%) males and 26 (40%) females aged 26-62 years (median 42 years). Thirty-nine (60%) participants had previous training in research, but only 12 (18.5%) had previously received grant writing training, and 17 (26.2%) had previously received manuscript writing and publishing training. Following training, 45 (70.3%) participants agreed that the training was relevant. The research, grant writing and manuscript writing, and publication components of the training were rated high by the participants (45-59, 70.3-92.2%). However, 41.2% felt that there was not enough time, and 32.4% felt that the training was too comprehensive. Nearly all the participants agreed that the training had improved their skills in research, grant writing and manuscript writing and publication, and more than two-thirds subsequently engaged in informal mentoring of others. Overall, participants achieved success in designing their own research projects and publishing manuscripts and grants. Three (4.6%) of the participants had gone on to become faculty for the research training programme. The three top barriers encountered following training were time constraints (67.3%), lack of funding (36.5%) and not being able to find research collaborators (25%).

Conclusion: Outcome of this training programme is encouraging and highlights the feasibility and potential impact of deploying such programmes in low and middle income countries (LMICs). Despite the positive outcomes, barriers including time constraints, funding limitations, and difficulties in finding research collaborators remain to be addressed. Such training programmes need to be supported to strengthen the research capacity in this and similar settings.

Keywords: impact; low-resource setting; research capacity; structured training; surgical plan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

NO is the Africa regional director for Smile Train. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Improvements in participants’ skills and involvement in research, grant writing, and manuscript writing mentoring activities.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Participants’ level of confidence in their research, grant writing, and manuscript writing skills after training.

Similar articles

References

    1. Shrime MG, Bickler SW, Alkire BC, Mock C. Global burden of surgical disease: an estimation from the provider perspective. Lancet Glob Health. (2015) 3:S8–9. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70384-5, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, Alkire BC, Alonso N, Ameh EA, et al. . Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet. (2015) 386:569–624. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60160-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural, Organization . UNESCO Global Science Report: Towards 2030. UNESCO Publishing, Paris, (2015). Available at: https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/unesco-science-repo... (Accessed April 27, 2024).
    1. Bekele A, Alayande BT, Powell BL, Obi N, Seyi-Olajide JO, Riviello RR, et al. . National Surgical Healthcare Policy Development and implementation: where do we stand in Africa? World J Surg. (2023) 47:3020–9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07131-0, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seyi-Olajide JO, Brindle M, Faboya O, Sleemi A, Williams O, Ameh EA. Is neocolonialism existing in global surgery practice? An analysis of a web-based survey amongst global surgery practitioners. J Glob Health Rep. (2024) 8:e2024016. doi: 10.29392/001c.117624 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources