Generation (not production) improves the fidelity of visual representations in picture naming
- PMID: 39186209
- DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02566-5
Generation (not production) improves the fidelity of visual representations in picture naming
Abstract
The production effect refers to the finding that participants better remember items read aloud than items read silently. This pattern has been attributed to aloud items being relatively more distinctive in memory than silent items, owing to the integration of additional sensorimotor features within the encoding episode that are thought to facilitate performance at test. Other theorists have instead argued that producing an item encourages additional forms of processing not limited to production itself. We tested this hypothesis using a modified production task where participants named monochromatic line drawings aloud or silently either by generating the names themselves (no label condition) or reading a provided label (label condition). During a later test, participants were presented with each line drawing a second time and required to reproduce the original color and location using a continuous slider. Production was found to improve memory for visual features, but only when participants were required to generate the label themselves. Our findings support the notion that picture naming improves memory for visual features; however, this benefit appears to be driven by factors related to response generation rather than production itself.
Keywords: Distinctiveness; Generation; Memory; Processing; Production.
© 2024. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval: The study was approved by the Interdisciplinary Committee on Ethics in Human Research (ICEHR) at Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador. All aspects of the study adhered to ethical standards outlined in the 1964 Helinski Declaration. Consent to participate: All participants in this study provided informed consent to participate. Consent to publish: All participants in this study provided informed consent to have their data published. Open practices statement: The experiment reported herein was not preregistered. The materials for the experiment are available at http://timbrady.org/resources.html . Data and analysis scripts are available at https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13270669 . Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no competing financial or proprietary interests relevant to the content of the article.
Similar articles
-
Mechanisms underlying the production effect for singing.Can J Exp Psychol. 2019 Dec;73(4):254-264. doi: 10.1037/cep0000179. Epub 2019 Aug 8. Can J Exp Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31393154
-
Production of picture names improves picture recognition.Can J Exp Psychol. 2020 Mar;74(1):35-43. doi: 10.1037/cep0000185. Epub 2019 Aug 8. Can J Exp Psychol. 2020. PMID: 31393155
-
Singing Does Not Necessarily Improve Memory More Than Reading Aloud.Exp Psychol. 2024 Jan;71(1):33-50. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000614. Exp Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39078072
-
Enhancing the production effect in memory.Memory. 2013;21(8):904-15. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.766754. Epub 2013 Feb 5. Memory. 2013. PMID: 23384885
-
Give me enough time to rehearse: presentation rate modulates the production effect.Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1603-1614. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02437-5. Epub 2024 Jan 2. Psychon Bull Rev. 2024. PMID: 38169042
Cited by
-
It's All About That Case.Exp Psychol. 2024 Mar;71(2):83-96. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000615. Epub 2024 Sep 24. Exp Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39314148 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bailey, L. M., Bodner, G. E., Matheson, H. E., Stewart, B. M., Roddick, K., O’Neil, K., Simmons, M., Lambert, A. M., Krigolson, O. E., Newman, A. J., & Fawcett, J. M. (2021). Neural correlates of the production effect: An fMRI study. Brain and Cognition, 152(2021), 105757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105757 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bellezza, F. S. (1981). Mnemonic devices: Classification, characteristics, and criteria. Review of Educational Research, 51(2), 247–275. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543051002247 - DOI
-
- Bodner, G. E., Huff, M. J., & Taikh, A. (2020). Pure-list production improves item recognition and sometimes also improves source memory. Memory & Cognition, 48, 1281–1294. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01044-2 - DOI
-
- Boucart, M., Meyer, M. E., Pins, D., Humphreys, G. W., Scheiber, C., Gounod, D., & Foucher, J. (2000). Automatic object identification: An fMRI study. NeuroReport, 11(11), 2379–2383. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200008030-00009 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., Alvarez, G. A., & Oliva, A. (2008). Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(38), 14325–14329. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803390105
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources