Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul 27;16(7):e65503.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.65503. eCollection 2024 Jul.

The Minimally Important Difference (MID) in Visual Acuity That Represents Changes in Patients' Quality of Life

Affiliations
Review

The Minimally Important Difference (MID) in Visual Acuity That Represents Changes in Patients' Quality of Life

Osama H Ababneh et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

To assess the minimal change in visual acuity perceived by patients as important in different eye-related interventions. PubMed was utilized to search articles on each of the four major interventions: cataract surgery, keratoplasty, different glaucoma treatments, and refractive eye surgery, each combined with quality of life (QoL) and visual acuity keywords. The search was narrowed to articles between 2000 and 2023. Seventy-four major articles were thus reviewed. Of these, 27 studies reviewed the results of cataract surgery, 20 studies discussed the effect of keratoplasty interventions on the vision-related QoL (VRQoL), most showing that VRQoL improved significantly after keratoplasty, 11 studies investigated the effect of different glaucoma interventions on patients' visual acuity and the QoL, 16 studies reviewed refractive surgery, where they showed an improved QoL in most of the cases, although some of the studies showed a slight superiority of one intervention over the other in the short term. The minimally important difference (MID) perceived in visual acuity depends mainly on the type of surgical intervention (keratoplasty, glaucoma, or refractive surgery), and the impact on QoL on improved visual acuity differs depending on the intervention.

Keywords: cataract; glaucoma; keratoplasty; minimal important difference; refractive surgery; vision-related quality of life; visual acuity; visual function questionnaire.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

References

    1. Report from the NEI/FDA ophthalmic clinical trial design and endpoints symposium. Csaky KG, Richman EA, Ferris FL 3rd. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:479–489. - PubMed
    1. Endpoints for clinical trials in ophthalmology. Schmetterer L, Scholl H, Garhöfer G, Janeschitz-Kriegl L, Corvi F, Sadda SR, Medeiros FA. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2023;97:101160. - PubMed
    1. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, Boyer DS, Kaiser PK, Chung CY, Kim RY. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1419–1431. - PubMed
    1. Visual acuity as an outcome measure in clinical trials of retinal diseases. Beck RW, Maguire MG, Bressler NM, Glassman AR, Lindblad AS, Ferris FL. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1804–1809. - PubMed
    1. Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: what is the difference? Karimi M, Brazier J. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34:645–649. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources