Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 12:15:1446963.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1446963. eCollection 2024.

Body position and cuff size influence lower limb arterial occlusion pressure and its predictors: implications for standardizing the pressure applied in training with blood flow restriction

Victor S de Queiros  1 , Nicholas Rolnick  2   3 , Okan Kamiş  4 , Magno F Formiga  5 , Roberto F C Rocha  1 , Júlio César Medeiros Alves  1 , João Guilherme Vieira  6 , Jeferson Macedo Vianna  6 , Michal Wilk  7 , Krzysztof Fostiak  8 , Breno Guilherme de Araújo Tinôco Cabral #  1   9 , Paulo Moreira Silva Dantas #  1   9
Affiliations

Body position and cuff size influence lower limb arterial occlusion pressure and its predictors: implications for standardizing the pressure applied in training with blood flow restriction

Victor S de Queiros et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

Background: Arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) is a relevant measurement for individualized prescription of exercise with blood flow restriction (BFRE). Therefore, it is important to consider factors that may influence this measure. Purpose: This study aimed to compare lower limb AOP (LL-AOP) measured with 11 cm (medium) and 18 cm (large) cuffs, in different body positions, and explore the predictors for each of the LL-AOP measurements performed. This information may be useful for future studies that seek to develop approaches to improve the standardization of pressure adopted in BFRE, including proposals for equations to estimate LL-AOP. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. Fifty-one healthy volunteers (males, n = 25, females, n = 26; Age: 18-40 years old) underwent measurement of thigh circumference (TC), brachial blood pressure, followed by assessments of LL-AOP with medium and large cuffs in positions supine, sitting and standing positions. Results: The large cuff required less external pressure (mmHg) to elicit arterial occlusion in all three-body positions when compared to the medium cuff (p < 0.001). The LL-AOP was significantly lower in the supine position, regardless of the cuff used (p < 0.001). Systolic blood pressure was the main predictor of LL-AOP in the large cuff, while TC was the main predictor of LL-AOP with the medium cuff. Body position influenced strength of the LL-AOP predictors. Conclusion: Our results indicate that LL-AOP and its predictors are substantially influenced by body position and cuff width. Therefore, these variables should be considered when standardizing the pressure prescribed in BFRE.

Keywords: blood flow restriction therapy; blood pressure; cuff width; limb arterial occlusion; thigh circumference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

NR is the founder of THE BFR PROS, a BFR education company that provides BFR training workshops to fitness and rehabilitation professionals across the world using a variety of BFR devices. NR has no financial relationships with any cuff manufacturers/distributors. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Cuffs used in the present study.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
LL-AOP (mean and SD) in different body positions. Note: * = significant difference between cuffs (p < 0.001); $ = significantly lower than LL-AOP measured in seated and standing positions (p < 0.001); # = significantly lower than LL-AOP measured in standing positions (p < 0.001).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
LL-AOP (mean and SD) comparisons between males and females. Note: * = significant difference between means (p = 0.01).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Brown H., Binnie M. J., Dawson B., Bullock N., Scott B. R., Peeling P. (2018). Factors affecting occlusion pressure and ischemic preconditioning. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 18 (3), 387–396. 10.1080/17461391.2017.1421712 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen Y. T., Hsieh Y. Y., Ho J. Y., Lin J. C. (2021). Effects of running exercise combined with blood flow restriction on strength and sprint performance. J. Strength Cond. Res. 35 (11), 3090–3096. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003313 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cirilo-Sousa M. do S., Lemos J. B., Poderoso R., de raújo R. C. T., Aniceto R. R., Pereira P. M. G., et al. (2019). Predictive equation for blood flow restriction training. Rev. Bras. Med. do Esporte 25, 494–497. 10.1590/1517-869220192506186803 - DOI
    1. Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112, 155–159. 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.1552909.112.1.155 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crenshaw A. G., Hargens A. R., Gershuni D. H., Rydevik B. (1988). Wide tourniquet cuffs more effective at lower inflation pressures. Acta Orthop. Scand. 59 (4), 447–451. 10.3109/17453678809149401 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources