Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Aug 26;39(33):e249.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e249.

Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

Affiliations
Review

Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

Zafer Kocak. J Korean Med Sci. .

Abstract

The application of new technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), to science affects the way and methodology in which research is conducted. While the responsible use of AI brings many innovations and benefits to science and humanity, its unethical use poses a serious threat to scientific integrity and literature. Even in the absence of malicious use, the Chatbot output itself, as a software application based on AI, carries the risk of containing biases, distortions, irrelevancies, misrepresentations and plagiarism. Therefore, the use of complex AI algorithms raises concerns about bias, transparency and accountability, requiring the development of new ethical rules to protect scientific integrity. Unfortunately, the development and writing of ethical codes cannot keep up with the pace of development and implementation of technology. The main purpose of this narrative review is to inform readers, authors, reviewers and editors about new approaches to publication ethics in the era of AI. It specifically focuses on tips on how to disclose the use of AI in your manuscript, how to avoid publishing entirely AI-generated text, and current standards for retraction.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Ethics in Publishing; Retraction of Publication; Scientific Fraud; Scientific Integrity; Scientific Misconduct.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author has no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

    1. Turing AM. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind. 1950;49(236):433–460.
    1. Stone P, Brooks R, Brynjolfsson E, Calo R, Etzioni O, Hager G, et al. Artificial intelligence and life in 2030. One hundred year study on artificial intelligence: report of the 2015–2016 study panel, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. [Updated 2016]. [Accessed June 11, 2024]. https://ai100.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj18871/files/media/file/ai... .
    1. Singh J, Sillerud B, Singh A. Artificial intelligence, chatbots and ChatGPT in healthcare—narrative review of historical evolution, current application, and change management approach to increase adoption. J Med Artif Intell. 2023;6:30.
    1. Weizenbaum J. Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. 1st ed. San Francisco, CA, USA: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1976.
    1. Digital Scholar. What is ChatGPT: the history of ChatGPT – Open AI. [Updated 2023]. [Accessed June 12, 2024]. https://digitalscholar.in/history-of-chatgpt/#the-history-of-chatgpt-its... .

LinkOut - more resources