Socioeconomic status as a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women
- PMID: 39190862
- DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2024-0235
Socioeconomic status as a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women
Abstract
Objectives: Due to the association between COVID-19 and adverse pregnancy outcomes, pregnant women are considered to be a vulnerable patient group. Studies have shown that low socioeconomic status (SES) is a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection. COVID-19 and low SES are likely to have a synergistic adverse effect. This study aimed to evaluate the socioeconomic background, indicated by self-reported SES, educational level, and financial situation, in pregnant women who were positive for SARS-CoV-2.
Methods: A case-control study was conducted, including all pregnant women with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests at Kepler University Hospital Linz between May 2020 and August 2021 (n=150) and a control group matched 1:1 relative to gestational age at birth (n=150). Data were collected using written questionnaires and medical records from the hospital information system.
Results: Lower self-reported socioeconomic status (p=0.029) and lower education level (p=0.003) were detected in the COVID group. Mothers in the COVID group were significantly younger (p=0.024). However, after adjustment for educational attainment, younger age was not confirmed as a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy (p=0.326). The social gradient was not explained by the assumed mediators and confounders.
Conclusions: These findings confirm an association between lower socioeconomic status and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. Since both socioeconomic factors and COVID-19 impose negative effects on pregnancy outcomes, health inequalities should be taken into consideration when implementing SARS-CoV-2 prevention measures and when providing health care for pregnant women from disadvantaged communities.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; health inequalities; pregnancy; socioeconomic status.
© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.
References
-
- Chadeau-Hyam, M, Bodinier, B, Elliott, J, Whitaker, MD, Tzoulaki, I, Vermeulen, R, et al.. Risk factors for positive and negative COVID-19 tests: a cautious and in-depth analysis of UK biobank data. Int J Epidemiol 2020;49:1454–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa134 . - DOI
-
- Anesi, G. COVID-19: epidemiology, clinical features, and prognosis of the critically ill adult (30.03.2022) UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/covid-19-epidemiology-clinical-feature... . [Accessed 22 May 2022].
-
- Bein, BBM, Huggett, S, Wegermann, P. SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19: evidence-based recommendations on diagnosis and therapy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020;80:491–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1156-3991 . - DOI
-
- Hussain, B, Latif, A, Timmons, S, Nkhoma, K, Nellums, LB. Overcoming COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among ethnic minorities: a systematic review of UK studies. Vaccine 2022;S0264-410X:00446–7.
-
- Liao, TF, De Maio, F. Association of social and economic inequality with coronavirus disease 2019 incidence and mortality across US counties. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2034578. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.34578 . - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous