Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 27;25(1):278.
doi: 10.1186/s12859-024-05776-9.

HBeeID: a molecular tool that identifies honey bee subspecies from different geographic populations

Affiliations

HBeeID: a molecular tool that identifies honey bee subspecies from different geographic populations

Ravikiran Donthu et al. BMC Bioinformatics. .

Abstract

Background: Honey bees are the principal commercial pollinators. Along with other arthropods, they are increasingly under threat from anthropogenic factors such as the incursion of invasive honey bee subspecies, pathogens and parasites. Better tools are needed to identify bee subspecies. Genomic data for economic and ecologically important organisms is increasing, but in its basic form its practical application to address ecological problems is limited.

Results: We introduce HBeeID a means to identify honey bees. The tool utilizes a knowledge-based network and diagnostic SNPs identified by discriminant analysis of principle components and hierarchical agglomerative clustering. Tests of HBeeID showed that it identifies African, Americas-Africanized, Asian, and European honey bees with a high degree of certainty even when samples lack the full 272 SNPs of HBeeID. Its prediction capacity decreases with highly admixed samples.

Conclusion: HBeeID is a high-resolution genomic, SNP based tool, that can be used to identify honey bees and screen species that are invasive. Its flexible design allows for future improvements via sample data additions from other localities.

Keywords: Diagnostic; Hierarchical agglomerative clustering; Honey bee; Invasive; Network; SNP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of honey bee samples. Geographic location of honey bee specimens assayed using the Fluidigm and Agena platforms are indicated by blue dots
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
HBeeID tool. Workflow diagram of procedure undertaken to generate the HBeeID tool
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Process to identify diagnostic SNPs. DAPC plots showing clusters of samples of different HB populations used during the process to identify SNPs to differentiate populations. DAPC plots were generated using SNPs that differentiate a All samples into eight groups; b Puerto Rico HB; c A. m. syriaca HBs; d Africanized HBs; and e A. m. carnica, A. m. ligustica, EU and US domestic from all other HB populations. Meaning of acronyms used: SSA—Sub Saharan African; gAHB—Puerto Rico Bees (gentle Africanized HB); BrAHB—Brazilian AHB; CMAHB—Central Mexico AHB; US and EU Domestic; SWNOR—Sweden, Norway; US domestic—US HB; EU domestic—EU HB; carnicacarnica HB; syriacasyriaca HB; CALDOMH—carnica, anatoliaca, ligustica; iberiensisiberiensis HB; ligusticaligustica HB
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Visualization of hierarchical clustering. Diagram illustrating the agglomerative hierarchical clustering performed, using SNP genotypes, for the development of the Knowledge Base Network used to form HBeeID. Labels indicate the position of the respective groups and the level at which they clustered. The proportional graphs below show the genotype profile of honey bee samples for the 272 SNPs for selected nodes. The length of the bars represents the proportion of 0 (Green), 1 (Gray), or 2 (Pink) genotype in the honey bee samples that comprise each node. The higher the bar the higher the proportion of the corresponding state
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
a, b, c. a Genotypic relationship of honey bee samples. PCA plot generated using 874 HB samples genotyped with 272 SNPs using the Fluidigm genotyping platform. The reader is encouraged to see the interactive 3D version of this figure available to download in the supplementary section as Additional file 5_3D interactive plot and on github or Additional file 5 (html interface). b PCA plot of a subset of all samples from Africa, Italy, Malta, Israel, the Iberian Peninsula, Turkey, and the Republic of Georgia demarcated as per the HB group assignation given when using reference set III. c PCA of HB samples identified as per their assignation to the A, C, M, or O groups obtained in the GeneClass2 analysis run with reference set III
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Assignation of honey bees with different reference data. Geographic distribution of samples from Argentina and Florida (US) and their genetic assignations obtained with GeneClass2 using three different combinations of samples from Avalos et al. [84] and Wallberg et al. [53] as reference
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Visualization of agglomerative clusters. Dendrogram that visualizes the agglomerative clusters generated using the Ward clustering method for 874 samples genotyped for the 272 selected SNPs in HBeeID. The countries and their respective abbreviations are listed below the dendrogram

References

    1. Cardoso P, Erwin TL, Borges PAV, New TR. The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them. Biol Conserv. 2011;144(11):2647–55. 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.07.024 - DOI
    1. Gallai N, Salles JM, Settele J, Vaissière BE. Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline. Ecol Econ. 2009;68(3):810–21. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.014 - DOI
    1. Lautenbach S, Seppelt R, Liebscher J, Dormann CF. Spatial and temporal trends of global pollination benefit. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(4):e35954. 10.1371/journal.pone.0035954 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. IPBES. The assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production [Internet]. Zenodo; 2016 Dec [cited 2023 May 11]. Available from: https://zenodo.org/record/3402856
    1. Bauer DM, Wing IS. Economic consequences of pollinator declines: a synthesis. Agric Resour Econ Rev. 2010;39(3):368–83. 10.1017/S1068280500007371 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources