Comparison of the effects of high-flow nasal cannula and bilevel positive airway pressure treatments as respiratory physiotherapy interventions for children with asthma exacerbation: a randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 39194097
- PMCID: PMC11319030
- DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0588
Comparison of the effects of high-flow nasal cannula and bilevel positive airway pressure treatments as respiratory physiotherapy interventions for children with asthma exacerbation: a randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Objective: A high-flow nasal cannula is a practical and safe instrument that can be used for children with asthma exacerbation and promotes beneficial outcomes such as improved asthma severity scores and reduced hospitalization durations, salbutamol use, and oxygen use. To evaluate and compare the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula treatment and that of bilevel positive airway pressure treatment as respiratory physiotherapy interventions for pediatric patients who are hospitalized because of asthma exacerbation.
Methods: During a randomized clinical trial, treatment was performed using a high-flow nasal cannula and bilevel positive airway pressure for hospitalized children with asthma. After randomization, data regarding lung function, vital signs, and severity scores (pulmonary index, pediatric asthma severity, and pediatric asthma scores) were collected.
Results: Fifty patients were included in this study (25 in the Bilevel Group and 25 in the high-flow nasal cannula group). After 45 minutes of therapy, an improvement in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second was observed. The high-flow nasal cannula group required fewer days of oxygen (O2) use, used fewer bronchodilators (number of salbutamol puffs), and required shorter hospitalization periods than the Bilevel Group (6.1±1.9 versus 4.3±1.3 days; 95% confidence interval, -5.0 to -0.6).
Conclusion: A high-flow nasal cannula is a viable option for the treatment of asthma exacerbation because it can reduce the hospitalization period and the need for O2 and bronchodilators. Additionally, it is a safe and comfortable treatment modality that is as effective as bilevel positive airway pressure.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04033666.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest:
none.
Figures




Similar articles
-
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024. PMID: 38309959 Chinese.
-
High-flow nasal cannula and bilevel positive airway pressure for pediatric status asthmaticus: a single center, retrospective descriptive and comparative cohort study.J Asthma. 2022 Apr;59(4):757-764. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1872085. Epub 2021 Jan 15. J Asthma. 2022. PMID: 33401990
-
High-flow nasal cannula and noninvasive ventilation in pediatric emergency medicine.Pediatr Emerg Med Pract. 2020 Aug;17(8):1-24. Epub 2020 Aug 2. Pediatr Emerg Med Pract. 2020. PMID: 32678565 Review.
-
Noninvasive Respiratory Support for Pediatric Critical Asthma: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Respir Care. 2024 Apr 22;69(5):534-540. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11502. Respir Care. 2024. PMID: 38290751 Free PMC article.
-
The use of high-flow nasal cannula in the pediatric emergency department.J Pediatr (Rio J). 2017 Nov-Dec;93 Suppl 1:36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Aug 15. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2017. PMID: 28818509 Review.
References
-
- Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Global Strategy for asthma Management and Prevention, 2022. Fontana: GINA; 2022. [cited 2023 Dec 14]. www.ginasthma.org
-
- Gleason M, Cicutto L, Haas-Howard C, Raleigh BM, Szefler SJ. Leveraging Partnerships: Families, Schools, and Providers Working Together to Improve Asthma Management. 74Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2016;16(10) - PubMed
-
- Gomes EL, Cavassini CL, David MC, Luiz JG, Santos AD, Capeletti AM, et al. Does bilevel noninvasive ventilation have a bronchodilating effect and alter respiratory mechanics in asthmatic individuals after bronchoprovocation? Randomized, crossover study. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2021;34(2):124–133. - PubMed
-
- Lin HC, Wang CH, Yang CT, Huang TJ, Yu CT, Shieh WB, et al. Effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. Respir Med. 1995;89(2):121–128. - PubMed