Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul 29;14(4):1478-1495.
doi: 10.3390/clinpract14040119.

How to Evaluate the Efficacy of Manipulations in Spine Disorders-A Comprehensive Review of New and Traditional Outcome Measures

Affiliations
Review

How to Evaluate the Efficacy of Manipulations in Spine Disorders-A Comprehensive Review of New and Traditional Outcome Measures

Giacomo Farì et al. Clin Pract. .

Abstract

Spine pain (SP) is the most common musculoskeletal disorder that causes transitional forms of motor disability. Considering its affordability and safety, manipulative therapy (MT) stands as one of the primary therapeutic approaches for SP and the related dysfunctional consequences. However, it is still difficult to assess and quantify the results of this treatment since there is a lack of objective evaluation tools in the available scientific literature. Thus, the purpose of this comprehensive review is to summarize the main outcomes used to evaluate the effectiveness of spine manipulations, focusing on their strengths and weaknesses. An extensive review of the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases was performed to identify the literature of the last ten years regarding MT and the related assessment tools. A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. The analyzed literature indicates that a wide range of outcome measures have been used to assess the effectiveness of spine MT. Pain is the main aspect to be investigated but it remains difficult to elucidate since it is strongly linked to various dimensions such as self-perception and psychological aspects. Therefore, it seems necessary to include new tools for evaluating the effects of spine MT, with the aim of exploiting new technologies and taking into consideration the SP biomechanical and biopsychosocial aspects.

Keywords: manual therapy; measure; outcome; spine pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the selected studies.

References

    1. Shim G.Y., Choi J., Kim H.J., Kwon R., Kim M.S., Yoo M.C., Rahmati M., Cho W., Yon D.K. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Spine Pain, 1990–2019: A Systematic Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2023;23:644–645. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.10.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396:1204–1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kazeminasab S., Nejadghaderi S.A., Amiri P., Pourfathi H., Araj-Khodaei M., Sullman M.J.M., Kolahi A.A., Safiri S. Neck pain: Global epidemiology, trends and risk factors. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2022;23:26. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04957-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hartvigsen J., Hancock M.J., Kongsted A., Louw Q., Ferreira M.L., Genevay S., Hoy D., Karppinen J., Pransky G., Sieper J., et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018;391:2356–2367. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rubin D.I. Epidemiology and risk factors for spine pain. Neurol. Clin. 2007;25:353–371. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2007.01.004. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources