Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 29;12(8):548.
doi: 10.3390/toxics12080548.

Acute Toxicity of Commercial Wildfire Retardants to Two Daphniid Species (Ceriodaphnia dubia and Daphnia magna)

Affiliations

Acute Toxicity of Commercial Wildfire Retardants to Two Daphniid Species (Ceriodaphnia dubia and Daphnia magna)

Darlan Quinta Brito et al. Toxics. .

Abstract

In the face of global climate change, there has been an increase in wildfires around the world, highlighting the need for improved firefighting techniques, such as the use of fire retardants (FRs). These products can enter aquatic systems directly or through runoff, posing potential risks to aquatic biota. In this study, the acute toxicity (24-h/48-h EC50) of three distinct FRs (N-Borate, N-Phosphate+, and N-Phosphate-) was assessed on the immobility of freshwater microcrustaceans Ceriodaphnia dubia and Daphnia magna. The toxicity of the FRs varied up to two orders of magnitude, all of which presented risks to cladocerans even at dilutions much below those recommended by their manufacturers. Among the tested FRs, N-Phosphate- emerged as the most harmful to both species. Specifically, for C. dubia, the 24 h EC50 was 0.005% and the 48 h EC50 was 0.0019%, while for D. magna, 24 h EC50 was 0.003% and the 48 h EC50 was 0.0023%. With the increasing use of FRs for wildfire control, our study highlights the toxicity of newly formulated FRs to daphniid species and emphasizes the need for further evidence-based evaluations of their effects on freshwater ecosystems, which is crucial for choosing FRs that pose the lowest hazard to zooplankton communities.

Keywords: acute assays; fire retardants; freshwater; microcrustaceans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect concentration causing immobility in 50% of C. dubia (on the left) and D. magna (on the right) when exposed to the three different fire retardants (Confidence Interval: 95%): (a,d) display results for N-Borate FR (a product predominantly composed of N and B), (b,e) for N-Phosphate+ FR (a product with elevated levels of N and P), and (c,f) for N-Phosphate− FR (a product primarily containing N and P, albeit at lower concentrations).

References

    1. He T., Lamont B.B., Pausas J.G. Fire as a key driver of Earth’s biodiversity. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2019;94:1983–2010. doi: 10.1111/brv.12544. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alvarado S.T., Fornazari T., Cóstola A., Morellato L.P.C., Silva T.S.F. Drivers of fire occurrence in a mountainous Brazilian cerrado savanna: Tracking long-term fire regimes using remote sensing. Ecol. Indic. 2017;78:270–281. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.037. - DOI
    1. Sun Q., Miao C., Hanel M., Borthwick A.G.L., Duan Q., Ji D., Li H. Global heat stress on health, wildfires, and agricultural crops under different levels of climate warming. Environ. Int. 2019;128:125–136. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li P., Xiao C., Feng Z., Li W., Zhang X. Occurrence frequencies and regional variations in Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) global active fires. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2020;26:2970–2987. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brando P.M., Soares-Filho B., Rodrigues L., Assunção A., Morton D., Tuchschneider D., Fernandes E.C.M., Macedo M.N., Oliveira U., Coe M.T. The gathering firestorm in southern Amazonia. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eaay1632. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay1632. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources