Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov;37(6):e13258.
doi: 10.1111/jar.13258.

Understanding capabilities, opportunities and motivations to engage in physical activity for adults with intellectual disabilities: A qualitative evidence synthesis

Affiliations
Review

Understanding capabilities, opportunities and motivations to engage in physical activity for adults with intellectual disabilities: A qualitative evidence synthesis

Sophie C Westrop et al. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of theory-informed physical activity research with adults with intellectual disabilities. This study aimed to address this by synthesising existing literature and applying the COM-B model to understand capabilities, opportunities and motivations.

Methods: A qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted and reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and the ENTREQ. Three databases were systematically searched up to and including February 2022. Qualitative research relating to the physical activity of adults with intellectual disabilities were included. Thematic synthesis was conducted with themes mapped onto the COM-B model.

Results: Twenty-five studies were included. Influences of physical activity were identified and mapped onto the COM-B model, which also included COM-B influences of social support provided by caregivers.

Conclusions: There are many complex influences of physical activity for adults with intellectual disabilities. Researchers should consider the influences contributing to caregivers' capacity to support physical activity.

Keywords: COM‐B model; intellectual disabilities; physical activity; qualitative evidence synthesis; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Aherne, C., & Coughlan, B. (2017). A preliminary investigation of the suitability of aquatics for people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 21(2), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629516646513
    1. American Association of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. (2021). Intellectual disabilities: Definition, diagnosis, classification and systems of supports (12th ed.). American Association of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
    1. Atkins, L., Francis, J., Islam, R., O'Connor, D., Patey, A., Ivers, N., Foy, R., Duncan, E., Colquhoun, H., Grimshaw, J., Lawton, R., & Michie, S. (2017). A guide to use the theoretical domains framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Methodology, 12(77), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9
    1. Bains, K. K., & Turnbull, T. (2020). Using a theoretically driven approach with adults with mild‐moderate intellectual disabilities and carers to understand and improve uptake of healthy eating and physical activity. Obesity Medicine, 19, 100234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obmed.2020.100234
    1. Bossink, L. W. M., van der Putten, A. A., & Vlaskamp, C. (2017). Understanding low levels of physical activity in people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 68, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.06.008