Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Aug 9;16(16):2807.
doi: 10.3390/cancers16162807.

Journey through the Decades: The Evolution in Treatment and Shared Decision Making for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Affiliations
Review

Journey through the Decades: The Evolution in Treatment and Shared Decision Making for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Racquel S Gaetani et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

The management of locally advanced rectal cancer has undergone significant transformations over the decades and optimal treatment approaches continue to evolve. There have been numerous advances in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy from the first description of the abdominoperineal resection in 1908, timing of chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the late 20th and early 21st century, and most recently, the introduction of organ preservation or nonoperative management in 2004. Alongside these advancements, the concept of shared decision making in medicine has evolved, prompting a focus on patient-centered care. This evolution in practice has been fueled by a growing recognition of the importance of patient autonomy and the alignment of treatment options with patients' values and preferences. With the growing number of possible treatment options, variability in patient counseling exists, highlighting the need for a standardized approach to shared decision making in locally advanced rectal cancer. This narrative review will describe the evolution of treatment options of locally advanced rectal cancer as well as the concept of shared decision making and decision aids, and will introduce a decision aid for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who have achieved a complete clinical response and are eligible for watch and wait.

Keywords: colorectal cancer; decision aids; locally advanced rectal cancer; nonoperative management; quality of life; shared decision making; watch and wait.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Timeline of events in the evolution of the treatment and management of LARC, SDM, and PtDAs [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22].

References

    1. Siegel R.L., Giaquinto A.N., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2024;74:12–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Society A.C. Cancer Facts & Figures 2024. American Society of Cancer; New York, NY, USA: 2024.
    1. Miles W.E. A method of performing abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon (1908) CA Cancer J. Clin. 1971;21:361–364. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.21.6.361. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dixon C.F. Anterior resection for malignant lesions of the upper part of the rectum and lower part of the sigmoid. Ann. Surg. 1948;128:425–442. doi: 10.1097/00000658-194809000-00009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heald R.J., Husband E.M., Ryall R.D. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—The clue to pelvic recurrence? Br. J. Surg. 1982;69:613–616. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800691019. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources