Mechanical Circulatory Support with Impella: Principles, Evidence, and Daily Practice
- PMID: 39200728
- PMCID: PMC11354798
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164586
Mechanical Circulatory Support with Impella: Principles, Evidence, and Daily Practice
Abstract
The Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) microaxial pump is a percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) that has been shown to increase coronary perfusion, reduce myocardial oxygen demand, and improve peripheral organ perfusion. Therefore, indications for the Impella device include emergency use for cardiogenic shock (CS) and pre-emptive implantation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI). However, despite their exponential use in cardiovascular practice over the past decade, there is limited randomized evidence to support the benefits of this therapy and growing concern regarding complication rates. In this review, we summarize the principles, evidence, and practical considerations of the most widely used Impella CP percutaneous left ventricular support in both CS and HR-PCI settings, moving from the historical background to current issues and future expectations for this device.
Keywords: cardiogenic shock; high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention; mechanical circulatory support; percutaneous left ventricular assist devices.
Conflict of interest statement
GT received speakers’ fees from Abiomed and GADA; all other authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this publication.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Impella - Current issues and future expectations for the percutaneous, microaxial flow left ventricular assist device.J Cardiol. 2024 Apr;83(4):228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.10.008. Epub 2023 Nov 4. J Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 37926367 Review.
-
Percutaneous Transvalvular Microaxial Flow Pump Support in Cardiology.Circulation. 2022 Apr 19;145(16):1254-1284. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058229. Epub 2022 Apr 18. Circulation. 2022. PMID: 35436135 Review.
-
Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug 1;98(2):E222-E234. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29674. Epub 2021 Apr 1. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021. PMID: 33793051 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan;103(1):30-41. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30913. Epub 2023 Nov 23. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024. PMID: 37997292
-
A Review of Bleeding Risk with Impella-supported High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Heart Int. 2020 Dec 29;14(2):92-99. doi: 10.17925/HI.2020.14.2.92. eCollection 2020. Heart Int. 2020. PMID: 36276510 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Advances in Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS): Literature Review.Biomedicines. 2025 Jun 27;13(7):1580. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13071580. Biomedicines. 2025. PMID: 40722653 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous