Employing the Aviation Model to Reduce Errors in Robotic Gynecological Surgery: A Narrative Review
- PMID: 39201172
- PMCID: PMC11353387
- DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12161614
Employing the Aviation Model to Reduce Errors in Robotic Gynecological Surgery: A Narrative Review
Abstract
The operating room is the environment where harm to the patient is most likely. Robotic surgery was listed as one of the top 10 health hazards as late as 2020. Taking inspiration from other fields of application, such as aeronautics, checklists have been increasingly implemented in medical practice over the years, becoming essential components of the operating theatre. In addition to checklists, simulation has taken on a fundamental importance in reducing errors. This paper aims to provide a narrative review to assess the importance of checklists and training in robotic surgery and how they improve the outcome. A comprehensive literature search from January 2000 to September 2023 was conducted. A total of 97 articles were included in the initial search. Eleven studies were deemed relevant and were considered eligible for full-text reading. Among these, ten studies focused on the analysis of training effectiveness. An article in our review assessed the benefits of introducing checklists in the operating room. Innovations created in aviation, such as checklists and simulation, have entered the medical field to prevent human error. Developing dedicated checklist and surgical teams, through theoretical and practical training, has become essential in modern medicine. Tools such as checklists, training, and simulation are among the best methods to reduce adverse medical events.
Keywords: aviation; checklist; robotic surgery; simulation; training.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Striving for a zero-error patient surgical journey through adoption of aviation-style challenge and response flow checklists: a quality improvement project.Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Jul;23(7):571-8. doi: 10.1111/pan.12121. Epub 2013 Feb 4. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013. PMID: 23373830
-
From Aviation to Pediatric Surgery.Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2024 May;63(4):557-559. doi: 10.1177/00099228231176631. Epub 2023 May 29. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2024. PMID: 37246755
-
Lessons from aviation - the role of checklists in minimally invasive cardiac surgery.Perfusion. 2016 Jan;31(1):68-71. doi: 10.1177/0267659115584785. Epub 2015 Apr 27. Perfusion. 2016. PMID: 25918039
-
Training in robotic surgery, replicating the airline industry. How far have we come?World J Urol. 2020 Jul;38(7):1645-1651. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02976-4. Epub 2019 Oct 17. World J Urol. 2020. PMID: 31624867 Free PMC article.
-
The checklist--a tool for error management and performance improvement.J Crit Care. 2006 Sep;21(3):231-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.06.002. J Crit Care. 2006. PMID: 16990087 Review.
Cited by
-
Exploring Urinary Tract Injuries in Gynecological Surgery: Current Insights and Future Directions.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;13(15):1780. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151780. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40805813 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Satisfaction evaluation of interns with Da Vinci robot surgical demonstration training in gynecologic oncology operations.Front Public Health. 2025 May 1;13:1569153. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1569153. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40376062 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Reason J.T. Human Error. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1990.
-
- Shappell S.A., Wiegmann D.A. A Human Error Approach to Aviation Accident Analysis: The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. Ashgate Press; Burlington, VT, USA: 2003.
-
- Gallotta V., Conte C., D’Indinosante M., Federico A., Biscione A., Vizzielli G., Bottoni C., Carbone M.V., Legge F., Uccella S., et al. Robotic Surgery in Elderly and Very Elderly Gynecologic Cancer Patients. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25:872–877. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.01.007. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cianci S., Arcieri M., Vizzielli G., Martinelli C., Granese R., La Verde M., Fagotti A., Fanfani F., Scambia G., Ercoli A. Robotic Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecologic Malignancies, Anatomic Landmarks, and Surgical Steps: A Systematic Review. Front. Surg. 2021;8:790152. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.790152. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources