Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 14;14(8):863.
doi: 10.3390/jpm14080863.

Targeted Screening for Cancer: Learnings and Applicability to Melanoma: A Scoping Review

Affiliations

Targeted Screening for Cancer: Learnings and Applicability to Melanoma: A Scoping Review

Lejie Zheng et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

This scoping review aims to systematically gather evidence from personalized cancer-screening studies across various cancers, summarize key components and outcomes, and provide implications for a future personalized melanoma-screening strategy. Peer-reviewed articles and clinical trial databases were searched for, with restrictions on language and publication date. Sixteen distinct studies were identified and included in this review. The studies' results were synthesized according to key components, including risk assessment, risk thresholds, screening pathways, and primary outcomes of interest. Studies most frequently reported about breast cancers (n = 7), followed by colorectal (n = 5), prostate (n = 2), lung (n = 1), and ovarian cancers (n = 1). The identified screening programs were evaluated predominately in Europe (n = 6) and North America (n = 4). The studies employed multiple different risk assessment tools, screening schedules, and outcome measurements, with few consistent approaches identified across the studies. The benefit-harm assessment of each proposed personalized screening program indicated that the majority were feasible and effective. The establishment of a personalized screening program is complex, but results of the reviewed studies indicate that it is feasible, can improve participation rates, and screening outcomes. While the review primarily examines screening programs for cancers other than melanoma, the insights can be used to inform the development of a personalized melanoma screening strategy.

Keywords: cancer prevention; melanoma; personalized screening; scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no known competing interest that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of selection of studies.

References

    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F., Bsc M.F.B., Me J.F., Soerjomataram M.I., et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Fuchs H.E., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022;72:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Learoyd D.L. Estimating the magnitude of cancer overdiagnosis in Australia. Med. J. Aust. 2020;213:189. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50575. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lew J.-B., Feletto E., Wade S., Caruana M., Kang Y.-J., Nickson C., Simms K., Procopio P., Taylor N., Worthington J., et al. Benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in Australia: An overview of modelling estimates. Public Health Res. Pract. 2019;29:29121913. doi: 10.17061/phrp2921913. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marcus P.M., Prorok P.C., Miller A.B., DeVoto E.J., Kramer B.S. Conceptualizing overdiagnosis in cancer screening. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2015;107:djv014. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources