Absolute and Relative Reliability of Spatiotemporal Gait Characteristics Extracted from an Inertial Measurement Unit among Senior Adults Using a Passive Hip Exoskeleton: A Test-Retest Study
- PMID: 39204911
- PMCID: PMC11360760
- DOI: 10.3390/s24165213
Absolute and Relative Reliability of Spatiotemporal Gait Characteristics Extracted from an Inertial Measurement Unit among Senior Adults Using a Passive Hip Exoskeleton: A Test-Retest Study
Abstract
Background: Seniors wearing a passive hip exoskeleton (Exo) show increased walking speed and step length but reduced cadence. We assessed the test-retest reliability of seniors' gait characteristics with Exo.
Methods: Twenty seniors walked with and without Exo (noExo) on a 10 m indoor track over two sessions separated by one week. Speed, step length, cadence and step time variability were extracted from one inertial measurement unit (IMU) placed over the L5 vertebra. Relative and absolute reliability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC).
Results: The relative reliability of speed, step length, cadence and step time variability ranged from "almost perfect to substantial" for Exo and noExo with ICC values between 0.75 and 0.87 and 0.60 and 0.92, respectively. The SEM and MDC values for speed, step length cadence and step time variability during Exo and noExo were <0.002 and <0.006 m/s, <0.002 and <0.005 m, <0.30 and <0.83 steps/min and <0.38 s and <1.06 s, respectively.
Conclusions: The high test-retest reliability of speed, step length and cadence estimated from IMU suggest a robust extraction of spatiotemporal gait characteristics during exoskeleton use. These findings indicate that IMUs can be used to assess the effects of wearing an exoskeleton on seniors, thus offering the possibility of conducting longitudinal studies.
Keywords: accelerometer; cadence; speed; step length; walking.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Walking against the odds: The intricate connection between spatiotemporal characteristics, kinetic and kinematic variables, cognitive stress, and passive assistive exoskeletons in senior and young adults.Hum Mov Sci. 2024 Oct;97:103268. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2024.103268. Epub 2024 Aug 10. Hum Mov Sci. 2024. PMID: 39128412
-
Validity of IMU sensors for assessing features of walking in laboratory and outdoor environments among older adults.Gait Posture. 2024 Oct;114:277-283. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.10.013. Epub 2024 Oct 22. Gait Posture. 2024. PMID: 39442222
-
Test-retest reliability of three dimensional gait analysis: including a novel approach to visualising agreement of gait cycle waveforms with Bland and Altman plots.Gait Posture. 2014 Jan;39(1):265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.07.130. Epub 2013 Sep 17. Gait Posture. 2014. PMID: 24139682
-
Validity and reliability of wearable inertial sensors in healthy adult walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 May 11;17(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00685-3. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020. PMID: 32393301 Free PMC article.
-
Powered single hip joint exoskeletons for gait rehabilitation: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jan 20;25(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07189-4. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. PMID: 38245729 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Micó-Amigo M.E., Bonci T., Paraschiv-Ionescu A., Ullrich M., Kirk C., Soltani A., Küderle A., Gazit E., Salis F., Alcock L. Assessing real-world gait with digital technology? Validation, insights and recommendations from the Mobilise-D consortium. J. Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023;20:1–26. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01198-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Weir J. Quantifying Test-Retest Reliability Using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and the SEM. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2005;19:231–240. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources