Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan;97(1):17-30.
doi: 10.1002/jad.12399. Epub 2024 Aug 28.

Defining contribution: A scoping review

Colin J Deal  1 , Helene Jørgensen  1 , Allison Sivak  2 , Nicholas L Holt  3
Affiliations

Defining contribution: A scoping review

Colin J Deal et al. J Adolesc. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: The term contribution is a key feature of approaches to positive youth development but has yet to be adequately defined. The purposes of this study were to identify properties that underlie contribution and to establish a theoretical definition of the construct.

Methods: A two-phase scoping review was conducted. The first phase involved the systematic search, selection, and analysis of studies from which six properties of contribution were identified and a preliminary theoretical definition was constructed. In the second phase expert judges rated the degree to that the proposed definition and the six properties of contribution fit with their conceptualization of the construct on a 6-point scale.

Results: Mean ratings for the definition and the six properties ranged from 5.05 to 5.70. Judges' ratings for the overall definition of contribution and the six properties were evaluated using Aiken's content validity coefficient (V). All V coefficients ranged in size from 0.81 to 0.94 and were statistically significant (p's < .01) indicating that the definition of contribution and the corresponding six properties fit well with experts' conceptualizations of the construct.

Conclusion: This study provides a theoretical definition of contribution that will serve as a foundation upon which future research in the area of positive youth development can build.

Keywords: adolescent development; contribution; positive youth development; prosocial behavior; scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search and screening results.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adler, R. P. , & Goggin, J. (2005). What do we mean by “civic engagement”? Journal of Transformative Education, 3(3), 236–253. 10.1177/1541344605276792 - DOI
    1. Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. 10.1177/0013164485451012 - DOI
    1. Anderson, S. , Allen, P. , Peckham, S. , & Goodwin, N. (2008). Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Research Policy and Systems, 6(7), 7. 10.1186/1478-4505-6-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arksey, H. , & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. 10.1080/1364557032000119616 - DOI
    1. Balsano, A. B. (2005). Youth civic engagement in the United States: Understanding and addressing the impact of social impediments on positive youth and community development. Applied developmental science, 9(4), 188–201. 10.1207/s1532480xads0904_2 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources