Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1985 Mar-Apr;100(2):131-46.

Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects

Review

Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects

R E LaPorte et al. Public Health Rep. 1985 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

More than 30 different methods have been used to assess physical activity. These methods can be grouped into seven major categories: calorimetry, job classification, survey procedures, physiological markers, behavioral observation, mechanical and electronic monitors, and dietary measures. No single instrument fulfills the criteria of being valid, reliable, and practical while not affecting behavior. The instruments that are very precise tend to be impractical on a population basis. Surveys are the most practical approach in large-scale studies, although little is known about their reliability and validity. Studies employing objective monitoring through heart rate, movement sensors, and doubly labeled water procedures appear promising, but are still experimental and costly. Despite the difficulty of measurement, relatively strong association has been found between physical activity and health, suggesting that, with improvements in assessment techniques, even stronger associations should be seen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Physiol. 1958 Oct 31;143(3):573-8 - PubMed
    1. Res Q. 1977 Oct;48(3):632-6 - PubMed
    1. Cardiology. 1981;67(2):110-28 - PubMed
    1. Pediatrics. 1968 Jan;41(1):18-29 - PubMed
    1. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1972 Jul-Aug;15(1):41-65 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources