Five-Year Outcomes of Measured and Predicted Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Abstract

Data on the long-term outcomes of prosthesis patient mismatch (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and clinical outcomes of measured PPM (PPM_M) and predicted PPM (PPM_P) in patients who underwent TAVI. This is a retrospective analysis of 3,016 patients who underwent TAVI at a large health care system between 2012 and 2021. Effective orifice area indexed to body surface area (EOAi) was measured at discharge using the continuity equation. EOAi was predicted according to the published predictive tables for each model and size of the valve. Primary end point was 5-year survival rate. Mean age was 80 years, and 55.6% were male. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score was 4.66%. 74.9% of patients received a balloon-expandable valve (BEV), and 25.1% received a self-expanding valve (SEV). The incidence of severe PPM was markedly lower when defined by predicted versus measured EOAi (0.8% vs 6.3%, p <0.001) and when assessed in SEV versus BEV (5.3% vs 6.6%, p = 0.02). Neither severe PPM_p nor severe PPM_M was associated with 5-year mortality (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.66, p = 0.095; hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 2.49, p = 0.954, respectively), irrespective of the presence of high residual pressure gradient. Neither BEV nor SEV was associated with an increased 5-year mortality, irrespective of PPM definition or severity. In this large health care system analysis, neither severe PPM_P nor severe PPM_M was associated with 5-year all-cause mortality. There was no difference between BEV and SEV in terms of mortality, irrespective of the definition or severity of PPM.

Keywords: effective orifice area; measured prosthesis-patient mismatch; outcomes; predicted prosthesis-patient mismatch; transcatheter aortic valve replacement.