Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 29;24(1):720.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05277-7.

Implementation of a multimodal home-based rehabilitation intervention after discharge from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation (GeRas): an early qualitative process evaluation

Affiliations

Implementation of a multimodal home-based rehabilitation intervention after discharge from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation (GeRas): an early qualitative process evaluation

Catharina Roth et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: Geriatric rehabilitation aims at increasing physical and social activity and maintaining the functional reserve of older people. However, the continuity of geriatric rehabilitation in the outpatient setting is limited due to a lack of structured aftercare programs. In order to overcome this, a three-month multimodal home-based intervention program (GeRas) was implemented. The aim of this early qualitative process evaluation was to assess GeRas in terms of perceived reach, effectiveness/efficacy, adoption/uptake, implementation, and maintenance/sustainability (Domains within the RE-AIM Framework) from the perspective of patients who received the intervention and healthcare providers who were involved in the delivery of the intervention.

Methods: In a qualitative process evaluation, 13 healthcare providers and 10 patients were interviewed throughout the beginning of the implementation period of GeRas to capture early experiences using a semi-structured interview guide. The interview guide and qualitative content analysis was guided by the RE-AIM Framework.

Results: The GeRas program was perceived to be largely well implemented and beneficial by healthcare providers and patients. According to healthcare providers, GeRas showed more advantages compared to usual care. Additionally, outcome expectations were mainly met (Domain 1: Effectiveness). However, the implementation of the intervention delivered via the eHealth system was perceived as challenging (Domain 2: Adoption). Nevertheless, the outpatient physical exercise, the outpatient counselling, and the continuous care after discharge improved perceived well-being regardless of the intervention type (Domain 3: Implementation). To facilitate the continued use of GeRas, technical requirements should be created to increase user-friendliness and to motivate patients to continue the training in the long term (Domain 4: Maintenance).

Conclusion: Although initial experiences with the implementation and effectiveness of GeRas were positive in general, organisational and technical issues need to be resolved to enhance sustainable and successful implementation of the GeRas program.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00029559). Registered 5/10/2022.

Keywords: E-health; Geriatric rehabilitation; Post inhouse rehabilitation intervention; Telemedicine; Transitional care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Representation of the data collection process of the qualitative process evaluation of the GeRas program. Green boxes refer to the data collection process of HCPs; yellow boxes refer to the data collection process of patients. The period between October 2022 and October 2023 is considered to be the first period of the implementation process of GeRas, it therefore represents the first experiences of HCPs and patients who participated in the GeRas program

Similar articles

Cited by

  • eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation: an international consensus study.
    Kraaijkamp JJM, Persoon A, Chavannes NH, Achterberg WP, Choukou MA, Dockery F, Kim H, Pérez LM, Pompeu JE, Topinkova E, Vassallo MA, Maier AB, Becker C, Amagasa Y, Holstege MS, van Haastregt J, van Dam van Isselt EF. Kraaijkamp JJM, et al. Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Jun;16(3):985-997. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01170-7. Epub 2025 Mar 21. Eur Geriatr Med. 2025. PMID: 40113729 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Mishra S, Gosling J, Laplante-Lévesque A, Zapata T, Azzopardi Muscat N. The need for rehabilitation services in the WHO European Region is substantial and growing. Lancet Reg Health - Europe. 2023;24:100550. 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100550 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ciol MA, Shumway-Cook A, Hoffman JM, Yorkston KM, Dudgeon BJ, Chan L. Minority disparities in disability between Medicare beneficiaries. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(3):444–53. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01570.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shumway-Cook A, Ciol MA, Yorkston KM, Hoffman JM, Chan L. Mobility limitations in the Medicare population: prevalence and sociodemographic and clinical correlates. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(7):1217–21. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53372.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loyd C, Beasley TM, Miltner RS, Clark D, King B, Brown CJ. Trajectories of Community mobility recovery after hospitalization in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(7):1399–403. 10.1111/jgs.15397 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cieza A. Rehabilitation the Health Strategy of the 21st Century. Really? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(11):2212–4. 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.05.019 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources