Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1985 Apr 20;290(6476):1173-5.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6476.1173.

Comparison of the antiemetics metoclopramide and promethazine in labour

Clinical Trial

Comparison of the antiemetics metoclopramide and promethazine in labour

L Vella et al. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). .

Abstract

A double blind trial was conducted in 477 mothers in labour to compare the antiemetics metoclopramide 10 mg and promethazine 25 mg and placebo when added to the first dose of pethidine. Metoclopramide and promethazine were equally effective, and both better than placebo, in reducing the incidence of nausea and vomiting after the administration of pethidine. Seventy seven per cent of mothers were drowsy, and 8% slept in the hour after the pethidine injection, with no difference between the groups. The sedative effect was more persistent in the promethazine group, 66% of whom were still drowsy after delivery. One third of the mothers in each group needed further analgesia, with 77% of these ultimately requesting an epidural. The reduction in pain half an hour and one hour after pethidine, assessed by a visual analogue scale, were, respectively, 22% and 22% for placebo; 26% and 23% for metoclopramide; 13% and 9% for promethazine. Analgesia after metoclopramide was significantly better than that after promethazine in terms of pain score, duration of first injection, and need for Entonox. Metoclopramide is therefore to be preferred to promethazine as an antiemetic in labour.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anesth Analg. 1977 Nov-Dec;56(6):801-7 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1975 Apr 19;1(7912):890-3 - PubMed
    1. Br J Anaesth. 1982 Apr;54(4):409-14 - PubMed
    1. Br J Anaesth. 1961 Jan;33:3-8 - PubMed
    1. Anesthesiology. 1961 Jan-Feb;22:34-41 - PubMed