Qualitative evaluation of the SHARING Choices trial of primary care advance care planning for adults with and without dementia
- PMID: 39211999
- PMCID: PMC11560609
- DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19154
Qualitative evaluation of the SHARING Choices trial of primary care advance care planning for adults with and without dementia
Abstract
Background: Primary care can be an important setting for communication and advance care planning (ACP), including for those with dementia and their families. The study objective was to explore experiences with a pragmatic trial of a communication and ACP intervention, SHARING Choices, in primary care for older adults with and without dementia.
Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews using tailored semi-structured guides with three groups: ACP facilitators who conducted the intervention; clinicians, managers, and administrators from sites randomized to the intervention; and patients and families who met with ACP facilitators. We used thematic analysis to identify and synthesize emergent themes based on key Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research concepts and Proctor's Implementation Outcomes, triangulating the three groups' perspectives.
Results: We identified five key themes. For acceptability, perceptions of the intervention were mostly positive, although some components were not generally implemented. For adoption, respondents perceived that ACP facilitators mainly focused on conducting ACP, although facilitators often did not implement the ADRD and family engagement aspects with the ACP. For relational connections, ACP facilitator-practice and clinician communication and engagement were key to how the intervention was implemented. For adaptability, ACP facilitators and health systems adapted how the ACP facilitation component was implemented to local preferences and over time, given the pragmatic nature of the trial. And, for sustainability, ACP facilitators and clinicians/managers/facilitators were positive that the intervention should be continued but noted barriers to its sustainability. Patients and families generally did not recall the intervention.
Conclusions: ACP facilitators and clinicians, managers, and administrators had positive perceptions of the ACP facilitator component of the intervention in this pragmatic trial with adaptation to local preferences. However, engaging those with dementia and families was more challenging in the implementation of this intervention.
Keywords: advance care planning; pragmatic trial; primary care.
© 2024 The American Geriatrics Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing a Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Communication With Older Adults With and Without Dementia (SHARING Choices) in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221137251. doi: 10.1177/21501319221137251. J Prim Care Community Health. 2022. PMID: 36398937 Free PMC article.
-
The importance of trust-based relations and a holistic approach in advance care planning with people with dementia in primary care: a qualitative study.BMC Geriatr. 2018 Aug 16;18(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0872-6. BMC Geriatr. 2018. PMID: 30115008 Free PMC article.
-
SHARING Choices: Design and rationale for a pragmatic trial of an advance care planning intervention for older adults with and without dementia in primary care.Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;119:106818. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106818. Epub 2022 Jun 8. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022. PMID: 35690262 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Barriers and facilitators for GPs in dementia advance care planning: A systematic integrative review.PLoS One. 2018 Jun 20;13(6):e0198535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198535. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29924837 Free PMC article.
-
Advance care planning for people with dementia: a review.Int Psychogeriatr. 2011 Dec;23(10):1535-51. doi: 10.1017/S1041610211001608. Epub 2011 Aug 26. Int Psychogeriatr. 2011. PMID: 21867597 Review.
Cited by
-
Advance Care Planning, End-of-Life Preferences, and Burdensome Care: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Feb 1;185(2):162-170. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6215. JAMA Intern Med. 2025. PMID: 39621341 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Bernacki RE, Block SD, for the American College of Physicians High Value Care Task F. Communication About Serious Illness Care Goals: A Review and Synthesis of Best Practices. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174: 1994–2003. - PubMed
-
- Dy SM, Waldfogel JM, Sloan DH et al. Integrating Palliative Care in Ambulatory Care of Noncancer Serious Chronic Illness. Rockville (MD), 2021. - PubMed
-
- Conwell L, Powell R, Machta R et al. Evaluation of the Primary Care First Model: First Annual Report. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2022.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous