Adult's Lived Experience Using the Insulin-Only Bionic Pancreas
- PMID: 39212346
- PMCID: PMC11571438
- DOI: 10.1177/19322968241274364
Adult's Lived Experience Using the Insulin-Only Bionic Pancreas
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to assess adults' perspectives after using the insulin-only Bionic Pancreas (BP) during a 13-week pivotal trial. Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems show promise in improving glycemic outcomes and reducing disease burden for those with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D). Understanding the lived experience of those using the BP can help to inform education and uptake of AID devices.
Methods: Adults ages 19 to 75 (n = 40) participated in age-specific focus groups (19-25, 26-40, 41-64, and 65+) exploring their experiences, thoughts, and feelings about using the BP. Three authors analyzed the focus group data using a hybrid thematic approach.
Results: Qualitative analysis of focus groups revealed 14 sub-themes falling into four major themes (diabetes burden, managing glucose levels, daily routine, and user experience). Although participants' overall experience was positive, some reported struggles related to managing out-of-range glucose levels and challenges with the system responding to unique meal schedules and exercise regimens.
Conclusion: This study captures patient perspectives regarding their experiences with a new AID system. Patient voice can inform device development and educational approaches for people with T1D. Identifying which patients may benefit the most from wearing this system may facilitate patient/clinician discussions regarding insulin delivery systems that best meet their individualized needs and expectations that may support device uptake and continued use.
Keywords: AID system; behavioral research; focus groups; patient-oriented research; psychosocial aspects.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: J.W.-B. reports consulting payments from Beta Bionics. M.F., K.R.H. and K.P.G. report no declaration of interest.
References
-
- Barnard KD, Hood KK, Weissberg-Benchell J, Aldred C, Oliver N, Laffel L. Psychosocial assessment of artificial pancreas (AP): commentary and review of existing measures and their applicability in AP research. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17(4):295-300. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0305. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Sharifi A, De Bock MI, Jayawardene D, et al. Glycemia, treatment satisfaction, cognition, and sleep quality in adults and adolescents with type 1 diabetes when using a closed-loop system overnight versus sensor-augmented pump with low-glucose suspend function: a randomized crossover study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016;18(12):772-783. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0288. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Beato-Víbora PI, Gallego-Gamero F, Ambrojo-López A, Gil-Poch E, Martín-Romo I, Arroyo-Díez FJ. Amelioration of user experiences and glycaemic outcomes with an advanced hybrid closed loop system in a real-world clinical setting. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021;178:108986. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108986. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical