A multicenter study of the risk of major bleeding in patients with and without cirrhosis undergoing percutaneous liver procedures
- PMID: 39213304
- DOI: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000447
A multicenter study of the risk of major bleeding in patients with and without cirrhosis undergoing percutaneous liver procedures
Abstract
Percutaneous liver procedures are frequently performed in patients with abnormal coagulation tests. Current guidelines suggest prophylactic transfusion is not mandatory in all patients with liver disease or cirrhosis, depending on the risk of bleeding. This study aims to describe the incidence and risk of major bleeding after percutaneous liver procedure in patients with and without cirrhosis. This retrospective study includes patients who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy and radiofrequency and microwave ablation of liver lesions at 3 centers in Spain. A transfusion protocol was considered for platelet counts <50,000 and/or international normalized ratio >1.5. The primary outcome was major bleeding. A total of 1797 patients were included in the study, with 316 having cirrhosis (18%) and 1481 without cirrhosis (82%). Among the patients with cirrhosis, 80 were classified as Child A, and percutaneous liver biopsy was the most frequent procedure (86%). Fourteen patients (0.8%) experienced major bleeding, with 0.4% occurring in radiofrequency and microwave ablation and 0.8% in percutaneous liver biopsy. Bleeding occurred in 0.6% of patients with cirrhosis compared to 0.8% in those without ( p = ns). No clinical or procedural variables were associated with bleeding. Twenty-five patients (1.4%) had an international normalized ratio >1.5, and 22 patients (1.2%) had a platelet count <50,000. Only 24% (6/25) of patients with an international normalized ratio >1.5 were transfused with fresh frozen plasma, and 72% (16/22) of those with platelet counts <50,000 received platelet transfusion. Patients with cirrhosis were more frequently transfused (5.9% vs. 1.5%). None of the patients who met the criteria for transfusion experienced major bleeding, regardless of whether they received a transfusion, and none of the patients who had a major bleeding episode met the transfusion criteria. In this cohort, major bleeding after percutaneous liver procedure occurred in <1% of patients, making it a low-risk procedure for patients with and without cirrhosis. Although not uniformly adopted, the current transfusion protocol still led to unnecessary blood product administration.
Copyright © 2024 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
References
-
- Midia M, Odedra D, Shuster A, Midia R, Muir J. Predictors of bleeding complications following percutaneous image-guided liver biopsy: A scoping review. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019;25:71–80.
-
- McDermott S, Gervais D. Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2013;30:49–55.
-
- Koda M, Murawaki Y, Hirooka Y, Kitamoto M, Ono M, Sakaeda H, et al. Complications of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in a multicenter study: An analysis of 16 346 treated nodules in 13 283 patients. Hepatol Res. 2012;42:1058–1064.
-
- Zensen S, Bücker A, Meetschen M, Haubold J, Opitz M, Theysohn JM, et al. Current use of percutaneous image-guided tumor ablation for the therapy of liver tumors: lessons learned from the registry of the German Society for Interventional Radiology and Minimally Invasive Therapy. (DeGIR) 2018-2022. Eur Radiol. 2024;34:3322–3330.
-
- Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B, Salazar GM, Schwartzberg MS, Walker TG, et al. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23:727–736.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous