Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Nov 1;70(11):920-928.
doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002305. Epub 2024 Aug 30.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Supported Patient Outcome Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Supported Patient Outcome Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Akshat Banga et al. ASAIO J. .

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unknown. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare benefit and risk of ECMO in TAVR patients. Bibliographic databases were searched from inception to January 1, 2024. Included studies involved patients ≥18 years old undergoing TAVR and using ECMO emergently or prophylactically. Mortality and procedure success were primary outcomes. Peri- or postoperative complications were the secondary outcomes. We identified 11 observational studies, including 2,275 participants (415 ECMO and 1,860 non-ECMO). The unadjusted mortality risk in ECMO-supported patient was higher than non-ECMO patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.73). The mortality unadjusted risk remained high (OR 3.89) and statistically significant for prophylactic ECMO. Prophylactic ECMO had lower mortality risk compared with emergent ECMO (OR 0.17). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-supported patients had lower procedural success rate (OR 0.10). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients undergoing TAVR had significantly increased risk of bleeding (OR 3.32), renal failure (OR 2.38), postoperative myocardial infarction (OR 1.89), and stroke (OR 2.32) compared with non-ECMO patients. Clinical results are not improved by ECMO support in patients with high-risk TAVR. Prophylactic ECMO outperforms emergent. Overall, ECMO support increases mortality and postoperative complications. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes may improve with prophylactic ECMO in high-risk situations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

References

    1. Brodie D, Slutsky AS, Combes A: Extracorporeal life support for adults with respiratory failure and related indications: A review. JAMA. 322: 557–568, 2019.
    1. Mastoris I, Tonna JE, Hu J, et al.: Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as bridge to replacement therapies in cardiogenic shock: Insights from the extracorporeal life support organization. Circ Heart Fail. 15: e008777, 2022.
    1. Zapol WM, Snider MT, Hill JD, et al.: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe acute respiratory failure. A randomized prospective study. JAMA. 242: 2193–2196, 1979.
    1. Brewer JM, Tran A, Yu J, et al.: ECMO after cardiac surgery: A single center study on survival and optimizing outcomes. J Cardiothorac Surg. 16: 264, 2021.
    1. Patel B, Diaz-Gomez JL, Ghanta RK, Bracey AW, Chatterjee S: Management of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. Anesthesiology. 135: 497–507, 2021.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources