Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep;25(9):e404-e419.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00130-X.

The oncological role of resection in newly diagnosed diffuse adult-type glioma defined by the WHO 2021 classification: a Review by the RANO resect group

Affiliations
Free article
Review

The oncological role of resection in newly diagnosed diffuse adult-type glioma defined by the WHO 2021 classification: a Review by the RANO resect group

Philipp Karschnia et al. Lancet Oncol. 2024 Sep.
Free article

Abstract

Glioma resection is associated with prolonged survival, but neuro-oncological trials have frequently refrained from quantifying the extent of resection. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) resect group is an international, multidisciplinary group that aims to standardise research practice by delineating the oncological role of surgery in diffuse adult-type gliomas as defined per WHO 2021 classification. Favourable survival effects of more extensive resection unfold over months to decades depending on the molecular tumour profile. In tumours with a more aggressive natural history, supramaximal resection might correlate with additional survival benefit. Weighing the expected survival benefits of resection as dictated by molecular tumour profiles against clinical factors, including the introduction of neurological deficits, we propose an algorithm to estimate the oncological effects of surgery for newly diagnosed gliomas. The algorithm serves to select patients who might benefit most from extensive resection and to emphasise the relevance of quantifying the extent of resection in clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests DPC serves on advisory boards for Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Incephalo, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Servier, Boston Scientific, and Pyramid Biosciences; receives consultant fees from the USA National Institutes of Health and Department of Defense; and fees from lectures for Merck. MvdB receives consultant fees from Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Agios, Boehringer, AbbVie, Bayer, Carthera, Nerviano, and Genenta. MW receives fees for honoraria or advisory board participation and consulting from Bayer, CureVac, Medac, Novartis, Novocure, Orbus, and Philogen; and research grants from Quercis and Versameb. MMK receives consultant fees from Blue Earth Diagnostics, and research grants from EpicentRx and Blue Earth Diagnostics. J-CT receives research grants from Novocure and Munich Surgical Imaging; serves on an advisory board for AAA Novartis; and receives royalties from Springer. All other authors declare no competing interests.

LinkOut - more resources