Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 2;22(1):70.
doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02285-4.

Perceptions of adults with type 1 diabetes toward diabetes-specific quality of life measures: a survey-based qualitative exploration

Elizabeth Holmes-Truscott  1   2   3 , Jasmine Schipp  4   5   6   7 , Debbie D Cooke  8   9 , Christel Hendrieckx  4   5   6 , Elizabeth J Coates  10 , Simon R Heller  11 , Jane Speight  4   5   6
Affiliations

Perceptions of adults with type 1 diabetes toward diabetes-specific quality of life measures: a survey-based qualitative exploration

Elizabeth Holmes-Truscott et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: Diabetes-specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaires are commonly used to assess the impact of diabetes and its management on an individual's quality of life. While several valid and reliable measures of diabetes-specific QoL exist, there is no consensus on which to use and in what setting. Furthermore, there is limited evidence of their acceptability to people with diabetes. Our aim was to explore perceptions of adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) toward five diabetes-specific QoL measures.

Methods: Adults (aged 18 + years) with T1D living in Australia or the United Kingdom (UK) were eligible to take part in 'YourSAY: QoL', an online cross-sectional survey. Recruitment involved study promotion on diabetes-related websites and social media, as well as direct invitation of people with T1D via a hospital client list (UK only). In random order, participants completed five diabetes-specific QoL measures: Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQoL-19); Diabetes Care Profile: Social and Personal Factors subscale (DCP); DAWN Impact of Diabetes Profile (DIDP); Diabetes-Specific Quality of Life Scale: Burden Subscale (DSQoLS); Diabetes Quality of Life Questionnaire (Diabetes QOL-Q). They were invited to provide feedback on each questionnaire in the form of a brief free-text response. Responses were analysed using inductive, thematic template analysis.

Results: Of the N = 1,946 adults with T1D who completed the survey, 20% (UK: n = 216, Australia: n = 168) provided qualitative responses about ≥ 1 measure. All measures received both positive and negative feedback, across four themes: (1) clarity and ease of completion, e.g., difficulty isolating impact of diabetes, dislike of hypothetical questions, and preference for 'not applicable' response options; (2) relevance and comprehensiveness, e.g., inclusion of a wide range of aspects of life to improve personal relevance; (3) length and repetition, e.g., length to be balanced against respondent burden; (4) framing and tone, e.g., preference for respectful language and avoidance of extremes.

Conclusions: These findings suggest opportunities to improve the relevance and acceptability of existing diabetes-specific QoL measures, and offer considerations for developing new measures, which need to be better informed by the preferences of people living with diabetes.

Keywords: Diabetes; Outcome measurement; Quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Jane Speight owns the copyright for ‘Diabetes QOL-Q’. All other authors declare no conflict of interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant flow and reasons for exclusion
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Speight J, Holmes-Truscott E, Hendrieckx C, Skovlund S, Cooke D. Assessing the impact of diabetes on quality of life: what have the past 25 years taught us? Diabet Med. 2020;37(3):483–92. 10.1111/dme.14196 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Speight J, Reaney MD, Barnard KD. Not all roads lead to Rome - A review of quality of life measurement in adults with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2009;26(4):315–27. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02682.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fisher L, Tang T, Polonsky W. Assessing quality of life in diabetes: I. A practical guide to selecting the best instruments and using them wisely. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;126:278–85. 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.10.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tang TS, Yusuf FL, Polonsky WH, Fisher L. Assessing quality of life in diabetes: II–Deconstructing measures into a simple framework. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;126:286–302. 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.10.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garratt AM, Schmidt L, Fitzpatrick R. Patient-assessed health outcome measures for diabetes: a structured review. Diabet Med. 2002;19(1):1–11. 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00650.x - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources