Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 15;9(34):36122-36133.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c00489. eCollection 2024 Aug 27.

Evaluation of ABD-Linked RM26 Conjugates for GRPR-Targeted Drug Delivery

Affiliations

Evaluation of ABD-Linked RM26 Conjugates for GRPR-Targeted Drug Delivery

Ábel Nagy et al. ACS Omega. .

Abstract

Targeting the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) with the bombesin analogue RM26, a 9 aa peptide, has been a promising strategy for cancer theranostics, with recent success in radionuclide imaging of prostate cancer. However, therapeutic application of the short peptide RM26 would require a longer half-life to prevent fast clearance from the circulation. Conjugation to an albumin-binding domain (ABD) is a viable strategy to extend the in vivo half-life of peptides and proteins. We previously reported an ABD-fused RM26 peptide targeting GRPR (ABD-RM26 Gen 1) that showed prolonged and stable tumor uptake over 144 h; however, the observed high kidney uptake indicated that the conjugate's binding to albumin was reduced and that this could be an obstacle for its use as a delivery system for targeted therapy, especially for radiotherapy. Here, we have designed, produced, and preclinically evaluated a series of novel ABD-RM26 conjugates with the aim of improving the conjugate's binding to albumin and decreasing the kidney uptake. We developed three second-generation constructs with varying formats, differing in the relative positions of the targeting moieties and the radionuclide chelator. The produced conjugates were radiolabeled with indium-111 and evaluated in vitro and in vivo. All constructs displayed improved biophysical characteristics, biodistribution, and lower kidney uptake compared to previously reported first-generation molecules. The ABD-RM26 Gen 2A conjugate showed the best biodistribution profile with a nearly 6-fold reduction in kidney uptake. However, the ABD-RM26 Gen 2A conjugate's binding to GRPR was compromised. This conjugate's assembly of albumin- and GRPR-binding moieties might be used for further development of drug conjugates for targeted therapy/radiotherapy of GRPR-expressing cancers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the ABD-RM26 s-generation molecular designs. ABD: albumin-binding domain. PEG4: 15-amino-4,7,10,13-tetraoxapentadecanoic acid. DOTA: 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy analysis. (A) CD expressed in molar ellipticity for ABD control and ABD-RM26 conjugates. (B) Normalized melting curves of the ABD control and ABD-RM26 conjugates showing the fraction of unfolded protein as a function of temperature.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensorgrams of ABD-RM26 conjugates and the ABD control binding to surface-immobilized HSA. A 2-fold dilution series with five concentrations of each construct were injected onto an HSA surface. Affinities to HSA based on a Langmuir 1:1 curve fit are presented in Table S1.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Biodistribution profiles of [111In]In-ABD-RM26 Gen 2A, [111In]In-ABD-RM26 Gen 2B, and [111In]In-ABD-RM26 Gen 2C at 4 h (A) and 24 h (B) post injection in Balb/c nu/nu mice bearing PC-3 xenografts. The bars represent the mean value and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Biodistribution profiles of [111In]In-ABD-RM26 Gen 1 and [111In]In-ABD-RM26 Gen 2A at 1 and 2 h pi in NMRI mice. The bars represent the mean value and the error bars represent the standard deviation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sekhoacha M.; Riet K.; Motloung P.; Gumenku L.; Adegoke A.; Mashele S. Prostate Cancer Review: Genetics, Diagnosis, Treatment Options, and Alternative Approaches. Molecules 2022, 27 (17), 5730.10.3390/molecules27175730. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xiao D.; Wang J.; Hampton L. L.; Weber H. C. The human gastrin-releasing peptide receptor gene structure, its tissue expression and promoter. Gene 2001, 264 (1), 95–103. 10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00596-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Markwalder R.; Reubi J. C. Gastrin-releasing Peptide Receptors in the Human Prostate: Relation to Neoplastic Transformation. Cancer Res. 1999, 59 (5), 1152–1159. - PubMed
    1. Gugger M.; Reubi J. C. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptors in non-neoplastic and neoplastic human breast. Am. J. Pathol. 1999, 155 (6), 2067–2076. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65525-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carroll R. E.; Matkowskyj K. A.; Chakrabarti S.; McDonald T. J.; Benya R. V. Aberrant expression of gastrin-releasing peptide and its receptor by well-differentiated colon cancers in humans. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 1999, 276 (3), 39.10.1152/ajpgi.1999.276.3.G655. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources