Evaluation of primary teeth root canal orifices with naked eye and using magnifying loupes - An in vivo study
- PMID: 39220757
- PMCID: PMC11362793
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.08.001
Evaluation of primary teeth root canal orifices with naked eye and using magnifying loupes - An in vivo study
Abstract
Background: Knowledge of the anatomy and morphology of root canal orifices and variations are vital elements affecting treatment outcomes.
Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate variations in the number of root canal orifices and their patterns in primary teeth, as identified by both the naked eye and under magnifying loupes.
Materials and methods: Total of 173 primary teeth was scheduled for pulpectomy over a period of 18 months. Two examiners assessed the number and pattern of the root canal orifices. After access cavity preparation, the operator recorded the number of root canal orifices with naked eye, and examiner recorded the same using magnifying loupes (3.5×). After cleaning and shaping, the same protocol was used. Collected data were statistically analyzed using SPSS version 23.0 and compared using a paired t-test.
Results: The overall variation in the in the identification of root canal orifices between the naked eye and magnifying loupes (3.005 ± 0.971) was statistically significant after access cavity preparation (P ≤ 0.05).
Conclusion: Magnifying loupes significantly enhances the determination of the number and pattern of root canal orifices in primary teeth. Therefore, the application of magnifying loupes is essential for accurately assessing variations in root canal orifices in primary dentition.
Keywords: Magnification; Magnifying loupes; Primary teeth; Root canal anatomy; Variation.
© 2024 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The research is original, not under publication consideration elsewhere, and free of conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Detection Rate and Ease of Locating Root Canal Orifices in Primary Molars Using Various Techniques, Namely Magnifying Loupes, Methylene Blue Dye, and Fluorescein Sodium Dye: An In Vivo Study.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2025 Jan;18(1):64-69. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3039. Epub 2025 Feb 14. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2025. PMID: 40110462 Free PMC article.
-
Detection rate of root canal orifices with a microscope.J Endod. 2002 Jun;28(6):452-3. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200206000-00008. J Endod. 2002. PMID: 12067127
-
Determination of frequency of the second mesiobuccal canal in the permanent maxillary first molar teeth with magnification loupes (× 3.5).Int J Biomed Sci. 2014 Sep;10(3):201-7. Int J Biomed Sci. 2014. PMID: 25324702 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of using magnifying dental loupes on clinical performance during tooth preparation: A systematic review.J Clin Exp Dent. 2024 Feb 1;16(2):e186-e197. doi: 10.4317/jced.61098. eCollection 2024 Feb. J Clin Exp Dent. 2024. PMID: 38496818 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The maxillary molar endodontic access opening: A microscope-based approach.Eur J Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;10(3):439-446. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.184153. Eur J Dent. 2016. PMID: 27403069 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Grindefjord M., Dahllöf G., Modéer T. Caries development in children from 2.5 to 3.5 years of age: a longitudinal study. Caries Res. 1995;29(6):449–454. - PubMed
-
- Dugas N.N., Lawrence H.P., Teplitsky P., Friedman S. Quality of life and satisfaction outcomes of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 2002;28(12):819–827. - PubMed
-
- Ahmed H.M. Anatomical challenges, electronic working length determination and current developments in root canal preparation of primary molar teeth. Int Endod J. 2013;46(11):1011–1022. - PubMed
-
- Salama F.S., Anderson R.W., McKnight-Hanes C.M., Barenie J.T., Myers D.R. Anatomy of primary incisor and molar root canals. Pediatr Dent. 1992;14(2):117–118. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources