Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 28:16:1091-1101.
doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S476150. eCollection 2024.

Prognostic Role of Pre-Treatment Body Composition Parameters in Patients Undergoing First-Line Immunotherapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Affiliations

Prognostic Role of Pre-Treatment Body Composition Parameters in Patients Undergoing First-Line Immunotherapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Sangmin Lee et al. Cancer Manag Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated the relationship between body mass index (BMI), radiological body composition, and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) underwent first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy.

Methods: Analyzing data from 102 patients treated between November 2019 and March 2023, pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) scans assessed fat and muscle areas. BMI and body composition indices were examined, including skeletal muscle index, subcutaneous fat index (SFI), visceral fat index, and total fat index. Kaplan-Meier curves and Log rank tests compared progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while multivariable Cox proportional regression analysis was performed to identify the variables significantly associated with survival outcomes.

Results: 54 patients (52.9%) experienced disease progression, and 26 (25.5%) died during a median follow-up of 17.4 months. High SFI was significantly associated with improved OS (p = 0.018) but not PFS (p = 0.090). Multivariable analysis confirmed the positive impact of high SFI on OS (adjusted HR: 0.37, p = 0.029) and suggested a trend towards improved PFS (adjusted HR: 0.61, p = 0.088). Notably, in the ipilimumab + nivolumab subgroup, high SFI significantly correlated with both PFS and OS (p = 0.047 and p = 0.012, respectively).

Conclusion: High SFI predicts favorable OS in patients with mRCC receiving first-line ICI-based therapy, especially patients treated with ipilimumab + nivolumab displayed a significant association between high SFI and favorable PFS and OS.

Keywords: body composition; immunotherapy; prognosis; renal cell carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Semiautomatic quantification of body composition in a 58-year-old male with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. To enhance the visibility of muscle boundaries, computed tomography (CT) image intensity was linearly transformed into a range of 0 to +100 Hounsfield Units (HU) (A). Following semiautomatic manipulation (B), the active contour method is used to detect the boundary between muscles and inner tissues by minimizing a cost function, thereby segmenting CT images into inner and outer regions (C). Subsequently, pixels corresponding to fat and muscle are identified using predefined cut-off values of −300 to −50 HU and −29 to +150 HU, respectively. Regions of muscle, subcutaneous fat, and visceral fat are displayed as color-coded in green, red, and blue, respectively (D). The cross-sectional areas of muscle, subcutaneous fat, and visceral fat are quantified at 140.18 cm², 94.95 cm², and 186.46 cm², respectively. CT, computed tomography; HU, Hounsfield unit.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival and progression-free survival according to high and low subcutaneous fat indexes (SFI).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival and progression-free survival according to high and low subcutaneous fat indexes (SFI) in the ipilimumab + nivolumab subgroup and immune checkpoint inhibitors with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ICI with TKI) subgroup.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scelo G, Larose TL. Epidemiology and risk factors for kidney cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(36):JCO2018791905. doi:10.1200/JCO.2018.79.1905 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Santoni M, Buti S, Myint ZW, et al. Real-world outcome of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and intermediate- or poor-risk international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium criteria treated by immune-oncology combinations: differential effectiveness by risk group? Eur Urol Oncol. 2023;7:102–111. doi:10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basso U, Paolieri F, Rizzo M, et al. Compassionate use program of ipilimumab and nivolumab in intermediate or poor risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a large multicenter Italian study. Cancers. 2022;14(9):2293. doi:10.3390/cancers14092293 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ishihara H, Ishiyama Y, Nemoto Y, et al. Impact of body mass index on outcomes in an asian population of advanced renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2023;21(1):136–145. doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2022.08.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Motzer RJ, Penkov K, Haanen J, et al. Avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(12):1103–1115. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1816047 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources