Evaluating the Efficacy of Infliximab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature
- PMID: 39221404
- PMCID: PMC11365737
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65971
Evaluating the Efficacy of Infliximab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Abstract
The introduction of steroid therapy in 1955 markedly decreased the mortality rate of severe ulcerative colitis (UC) from 24% in the placebo group to 7%, and it is currently less than 1% in specialist centers. Despite this advancement, the response of severe UC to steroids has stagnated over the past 50 years, with a high rate of colectomy persisting for severe to moderately severe cases. Infliximab (IFX) (Remicade, Centocor Inc., Malvern, PA, United States), an intravenously administered chimeric monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 antibody targeting tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), has shown efficacy in numerous randomized controlled trials for treating moderate to severe and fistulizing Crohn's disease, particularly in patients unresponsive to conventional therapies. This led to its approval by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1998 for treating active and fistulizing Crohn's disease. Most clinical research on IFX has focused on Crohn's disease, which is characterized as a Th1-type condition driven by pro-inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α. Conversely, UC has traditionally been viewed as a Th2-type condition where TNF-α plays a lesser role. However, recent studies indicate that TNF-α might also contribute to the pathogenesis of UC. These findings highlight the necessity for larger randomized controlled trials to further investigate the benefits of therapies like IFX, with the ultimate goal of improving treatment outcomes and quality of life for patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Keywords: biological therapy; inflammatory bowel disease; infliximab; infliximab biosimilar; infliximab ct-p13.
Copyright © 2024, Vallejo et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
References
-
- Optimizing biologic therapy in IBD: how essential is therapeutic drug monitoring? Argollo M, Kotze PG, Kakkadasam P, D'Haens G. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17:702–710. - PubMed
-
- Efficacy and safety of biosimilar CT-P13 compared with originator infliximab in patients with active Crohn’s disease: an international, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority study. Ye BD, Pesegova M, Alexeeva O, et al. Lancet Lond Engl. 2019;27:1699–1707. - PubMed
-
- Serum concentrations after switching from originator infliximab to the biosimilar CT-P13 in patients with quiescent inflammatory bowel disease (SECURE): an open-label, multicentre, phase 4 non-inferiority trial. Strik AS, van de Vrie W, Bloemsaat-Minekus JPJ, et al. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3:404–412. - PubMed
-
- Full interchangeability in regard to immunogenicity between the infliximab reference biologic and biosimilars CT-P13 and SB2 in inflammatory bowel disease. Fiorino G, Ruiz-Argüello MB, Maguregui A, et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018;24:601–606. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous