Criteria for second generation comparator tests in validation of novel HPV DNA tests for use in cervical cancer screening
- PMID: 39221498
- DOI: 10.1002/jmv.29881
Criteria for second generation comparator tests in validation of novel HPV DNA tests for use in cervical cancer screening
Abstract
While HC2 and GP5+/6+ PCR-EIA were pivotal in test validation of new HPV assays, they represent the first generation of comparator tests based upon technologies that are not in widespread use anymore. In the current guideline, criteria for second-generation comparator tests are presented that include more detailed resolution of HPV genotypes. Second-generation comparator tests should preferentially target only the 12 genotypes classified as carcinogenic (IARC-group I), and show consistent non-inferior sensitivity for CIN2+ and CIN3+ and specificity for ≤CIN1 compared to one of the first-generations comparators, in at least three validation studies using benchmarks of 0.95 for relative sensitivity and 0.98 for relative specificity. Validation should take into account used storage media and other sample handling procedures. Meta-analyses were conducted to identify the assays that fulfill these stringent criteria. Four tests fulfilled the new criteria: (1) RealTime High-Risk HPV Test (Abbott), (2) Cobas-4800 HPV test (Roche Molecular System), (3) Onclarity HPV Assay (BD Diagnostics), and (4) Anyplex II HPV HR Detection (Seegene), each evaluated in three to six studies. Whereas the four assays target 14 carcinogenic genotypes, the first two identify separately HPV16 and 18, the third assay identifies five types separately and the fourth identifies all the types separately.
Keywords: HPV; HPV‐based screening; cervical cancer screening; diagnostic test accuracy; test validation.
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Medical Virology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Arbyn M, Ronco G, Anttila A, et al. Evidence regarding human papillomavirus testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Vaccine. 2012;30(suppl 5):F88‐F99.
-
- Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM, et al. Efficacy of HPV‐based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow‐up of four European randomised controlled trials. The Lancet. 2014;383(9916):524‐532.
-
- Sankaranarayanan R, Keshkar V, Kothari A, Kane S, Fayette JM, Shastri S. Effectiveness and safety of loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical neoplasia in rural India. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2009;104(2):95‐99.
-
- Bouvard V, Wentzensen N, Mackie A, et al. The IARC perspective on cervical cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(20):1908‐1918.
-
- Poljak M, Oštrbenk Valenčak A, Gimpelj Domjanič G, Xu L, Arbyn M. Commercially available molecular tests for human papillomaviruses: a global overview. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(9):1144‐1150.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- 847845/Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation of the European Commission, through the RISCC Network
- European Society of Gynaecological Oncology
- World Health Organization (Geneva, Switzerland, via Agreement for Performance of Work for guidelines on Screening and Treatment of Pre-Invasive Cervical Disease)
- German Guideline Program in Oncology (German Cancer Aid project)
- 001/WHO_/World Health Organization/International
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous