Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Dec 1;37(6):621-628.
doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001313. Epub 2024 Sep 2.

Noninvasive brain stimulation to improve motor outcomes after stroke

Emma C J Savelon  1   2 , Harry T Jordan  1   3 , Cathy M Stinear  2   3 , Winston D Byblow  1   2
Affiliations
Review

Noninvasive brain stimulation to improve motor outcomes after stroke

Emma C J Savelon et al. Curr Opin Neurol. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review highlights recent developments in noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques and applications for improving motor outcomes after stroke. Two promising areas of development relate to deep brain neuromodulation and the use of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) within a prediction tool for predicting upper limb outcome for individual patients.

Recent findings: Systematic reviews highlight the inconsistent effect sizes of interventional NIBS for motor outcome after stroke, as well as limited evidence supporting the interhemispheric competition model. To improve the therapeutic efficacy of NIBS, studies have leveraged metaplasticity and priming approaches. Transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS) and low-intensity focused ultrasound stimulation (LIFUS) are emerging NIBS techniques with potential for modulating deeper brain structures, which may hold promise for stroke neurorehabilitation. Additionally, motor evoked potential (MEP) status obtained with single-pulse TMS is a prognostic biomarker that could be used to tailor NIBS for individual patients.

Summary: Trials of interventional NIBS to improve stroke outcomes may be improved by applying NIBS in a more targeted manner. This could be achieved by taking advantage of NIBS techniques that can be targeted to deeper brain structures, using biomarkers of structural and functional reserve to stratify patients, and recruiting patients in more homogeneous time windows.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol 2021; 20:795–820.
    1. Hall P, Williams D, Hickey A, et al. Access to rehabilitation at six months post stroke: a profile from the action on secondary prevention interventions and rehabilitation in stroke (ASPIRE-S) study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2016; 42:247–254.
    1. Di Carlo A. Human and economic burden of stroke. Age Ageing 2009; 38:4–5.
    1. Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Noninvasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol 2006; 5:708–712.
    1. Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul 2008; 1:206–223.

MeSH terms